My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council Work Session - 02/11/2020 - Joint CC & Planning
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council Work Session
>
2020
>
Agenda - Council Work Session - 02/11/2020 - Joint CC & Planning
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 11:23:19 AM
Creation date
2/10/2020 12:07:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Title
Joint CC & Planning
Document Date
02/11/2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
140
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Tim Gladhill <br />From: Mike Tozier <br />Sent: Saturday, December 02, 2017 5:18 PM <br />To: Tim Gladhill <br />Subject: Villas at Northfork/Paxmar Project Comments <br />Note: Author confirmed he desired to resubmit with these comments with current proposal. <br />Dear Tim, <br />My business partner Tom Rosen and I purchased the Links at Northfork in 2002. We purchased the golf course mainly <br />because of its unique qualities, but we also saw the City of Ramsey as a growing market especially with Town Center <br />(COR) coming online. The Town Center concept provided multiple business opportunities including a high density <br />residential option. We expected the development of the COR to be a definite long-term benefit to our business. Fast <br />forward to 2017, we all know the trials and tribulations that the City has gone through with the original Town center <br />concept and what it has shaped into today. During my 15 years as a Ramsey business owner City Officials have done a <br />very good trying to direct that project in a positive manner. The biggest issue, however, is that the growth promise of <br />high density and more household wallets has never really happened in a quick and meaningful manner. Obviously, this <br />fact has been very disappointing to us. <br />About a year ago or so, we were buoyed to hear about the housing project proposed adjacent to our holes #4 and <br />#5. We were even happier when the dirt started moving and you could see a whole new higher density neighborhood <br />begin to develop. Finally, part of the puzzle we had looked at back in 2002 was finally moving forward. Albeit in a <br />slightly different area then Town Center. Then this summer we heard about the Paxmar project. We were excited to <br />learn that it would be geared toward residents 50 and older and would be upscale. Looking at it from afar it looked like <br />the best of both worlds. We felt that both projects would benefit us and that our golf course would provide a unique <br />amenity that most developers and smaller cities in the metro can rarely couple together. <br />The only hiccup for us with the Paxmar project was a potential easement issue. On Friday, I met with Kent and Alan <br />Roessler to discuss their proposed project, which is adjacent to the Links at Northfork holes #2 and #3. The meeting <br />centered around land and easement options that would allow the Links at Northfork to retain our current cart path <br />routing by the hole #2 green to hole # 3 tee box. Overall, the meeting went very well with both parties agreeing to <br />work together long term on a solution. <br />At the end of the meeting, Kent mentioned that the City of Ramsey didn't support their higher density plan. He said that <br />the City felt that the plan didn't fit into the Comprehensive and Zoning Plans. When I heard this, I was extremely <br />disappointed and a little confused. I'm not a City leader nor a developer so excuse my ignorance on the inner workings <br />of Comprehensive plans and Zoning. However, as a business owner in the area and a taxpayer in Anoka County, I'm <br />shocked that the City of Ramsey would pass up the opportunity to increase the tax base with 100 high end villas vs. 16 <br />homes. I was also surprised to hear that there was some Northfork residents that opposed the project. Having owned <br />the course for 15 years we know the homeowners well and we respect their judgement. However, on this project I'm a <br />little bit dismayed to hear the clamor over increased traffic, noise, property values, etc. These are the same residents <br />that complain there are no big box stores, a lack of dining options locally, etc. Do they realize that one way to get those <br />retailers to look at the City of Ramsey is to increase the density and population in the area? The other thing that I don't <br />understand is why would the City take advantage of bringing sewer to the housing project to the East yet deny that <br />continued advancement of infrastructure to the Paxmar project. It's puzzling. <br />Let me finish by saying I appreciate the work that the City of Ramsey does. Our golf course has a great relationship with <br />the City and we want to continue to foster that. However, on the Paxmar issue I think the City is missing a great <br />opportunity for the whole area. I encourage the City of Ramsey to reconsider. <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.