My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Public Works Committee - 02/18/2020
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Public Works Committee
>
2020
>
Agenda - Public Works Committee - 02/18/2020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 11:26:52 AM
Creation date
2/19/2020 11:26:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Public Works Committee
Document Date
02/18/2020
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
406
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Drive and Puma Street. The parcel, which is outside of the Metro Urban Service Area, is identified as County <br />Parcel #20-32-25-31-0002. At the present time AKM is not intending to pursue any development plans nor incur <br />any additional engineering design expenses on this parcel until after such time that the MUSA and zoning is <br />approved. <br />AKM is not in agreement with the cost share proposal as presently proposed for the street improvements, as well <br />as the cost share proposal for the development of plans and specifications. Under the present plan AKM is being <br />assigned costs for a portion of land at the proposed realignment of Puma Street (north end) that is not directly <br />adjacent to our land and we are not agreeable to this. The land encompassing the proposed realignment route is <br />owned by the City of Ramsey and is not under contract by AKM Farm, LLC. AKM may have a future interest in the <br />property but it is not essential to the future development of our 30.5 +/- acres. <br />Regarding the portion of Puma Street that is directly adjacent to our property, we do not agree with the ability to <br />assess these street improvements as a 429 project since our parcel doesn’t gain direct benefits as a result. Any <br />lots on our parcel would back up to Puma Street (i.e. not have direct access) and our property subdivision could <br />be designed with all public street access from Alpine Drive via two access points. Also, the collector street <br />improvements of Puma Street serve a much wider area other than just the two adjacent residential/future <br />residential properties. Puma serves as the secondary access to the entire business park; without a Puma Street <br />connection to Alpine Drive the entire business park is on a single ¾ mile long dead end street. <br />We are not in opposition to the proposed improvements, but we are opposed to the cost distribution as proposed. <br />Thank you for your time and consideration. <br />Jay Roos <br />(763)753-6176 x450 <br />2850 Cutters Grove Ave.; Suite 207 <br />Anoka, MN 55303 <br />www.paxmar.com | <br />From: Tim Gladhill <tgladhill@ci.ramsey.mn.us> <br />Sent: Wednesday, February 5, 2020 3:30 PM <br />Cc: Chloe McGuire Brigl; Bruce Westby; Kurt Ulrich; Diana Lund <br />Subject: Puma Street Assessment <br />This message has been copied to Paxmar and Capstone Homes. <br />All: <br />Our design engineer on the project provided clarification today on the project costs. The Trunk Water and Sanitary Sewer <br />estimated costs are $230,000 to be paid by the City’s Trunk Water and Sanitary Sewer Accounts (paid for by Developer Trunk <br />Fees). <br />The remaining costs (road, storm, trail and lighting) result in $760,000. This is the amount that we would proposed to split <br />three ways ($253,333 each). <br />Please let me know if you have any additional questions. We will be presenting this information next week at the 2/11 Joint <br />Work Session in concept, with a more detailed review at the 2/18 Public Works Committee. <br />Sincerely, <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.