My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 04/12/2005
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2005
>
Agenda - Council - 04/12/2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 1:47:09 PM
Creation date
4/8/2005 3:21:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
04/12/2005
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
461
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
thc Comprehensive Plan does not make as much sense as when it was studied with the MUSA <br />linc. l lc stated the Comprehensive Plan is inefficient to meet today's needs under today's <br />standards. <br /> <br />N/Iayor (iamec inquired what type of criteria Councilmember Strommen would suggest be <br />followcct. <br /> <br />Councihnember Strmnmen replied the City went through a process with the Comprehensive <br />Plan. t lcr underlying concern is to go forward with these amendments without going through <br />that planning process that considers issues like green space and transportation. These issues <br />should be considcrcd as these developments come through. <br /> <br />City Administrator Norman suggested he work with Councilmember Strommen in drafting a <br />letter lyf thc l~lanning Commission. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamcc stated each development that is considered includes a review of transportation and <br />an I';A W. I lc believes all of these things are reviewed with every development in the City. <br /> <br />Councilmember Strommen stated one of her concerns is that the City has not completed studies <br />on thc transportation corridor, future greenways, and open space. The City may not have the <br />option to implement what they want once these amendments go through because there may be a <br />development in the middle of an area they want to utilize. <br /> <br />Mayor (;amcc stated the Council just reviewed the greenways and Engineering has information <br />regarding the wetland locations. <br /> <br />Assistant Public Works Director Olson indicated the greenways grant was never adopted by the <br />Cc)until and staff will be meeting tomorrow to refine some of the areas. He explained wetland <br />delineation is required in every development. The current Comprehensive Plan does not really <br />include a wetland or grcenspace plan, and that should be included. <br /> <br />Councihncmber Pearson stated he agrees with the comments made by Councilmember Cook. <br />'['hc Comprehensive Plan is outdated. There are not too many large parcels of land left and it <br />docs not sccm to make sense to develop them and not have sewer and water connected to them. <br />~l't~cy sh(mld focus the higher density on the Town Center area, and when these other places <br />become available they should seriously look at getting water and sewer there. <br /> <br />Ccmncilmcmbcr Cook stated the greenway map needs to be adopted before these developments <br />proceed to final plat approval. It has been mandated that Park and Recreation update their trail <br />map and that should also be completed before these developments proceed to final plat approval. <br /> <br />City Administrator Norman indicated Engineering and Planning staff have been working to <br />quickly have this information before the Environmental Policy Board and Park and Recreation <br />Igoard. <br /> <br />City Council Work Session/March 15, 2005 <br /> Page 4 of 9 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.