Laserfiche WebLink
Public Works Committee 5. 2. <br />Meeting Date: 01/21/2020 <br />By: Bruce Westby, Engineering/Public <br />Works <br />Title: <br />Consider City Council Recommendation to Indefinitely Suspend Pavement Sealcoating Program <br />Purpose/Background: <br />Purpose: <br />The purpose of this case is to consider a recommendation to the City Council to indefinitely suspend the City's <br />annual pavement sealcoating program. <br />Background: <br />Since 2015, the City of Ramsey has budgeted $500,000 each year for the purpose of cracksealing and sealcoating <br />between 13 and 23 miles of City streets annually. Prior to 2015, cracksealing and sealcoating was generally <br />completed on a less frequent basis based on availability of funding. <br />The purpose of sealcoating is to protect existing bituminous pavement from damage caused by stormwater runoff, <br />ultraviolet rays from the sun, and petroleum deposits left by vehicles using the streets. In addition, a small amount <br />of oil in the sealcoat emulsion is absorbed by the underlying pavement, helping to rejuvenate up to the top <br />quarter -inch of pavement. <br />In the spring of 2019, Staff began observing significant damage to the underlying pavement of several streets <br />sealcoated since 2015. Staff has since been monitoring streets sealcoated since 2015 to document the scope and <br />severity of observed pavement stripping issues, and to explore the root cause(s) of pavement stripping observed in <br />Ramsey. Pictures of damage caused by pavement stripping under sealcoats on several streets in Ramsey are attached. <br />Numerous cities across the Twin Cities metro area have experienced pavement stripping issues under sealcoats over <br />the last decade or more, including cities in the northwest metro. Since last spring, Staff has discussed pavement <br />stripping issues experienced by numerous metro area cities, including those cities that have been experiencing this <br />issue the longest, with the goal of better understanding the cause(s) of pavement stripping, how to cost-effectively <br />repair damaged pavement, and if reasonable alternatives to sealcoating exist. <br />Attached to this case is a summary of Staff's research into pavement stripping, which includes findings and <br />practices of other metro area cities, general comments and/or observations received from other cities and from <br />sealcoat practitioners and experts, as well as conclusions and recommendations reached by pavement stripping <br />research reports completed by the Minnesota Local Road Research Board (LRRB). The LRRB was established in <br />1959 through state legislation with the goal of improving the quality of Minnesota's transportation systems through <br />grassroots research efforts. Copies of LRRB Technical Reports #2013-08 and #2017-35 are attached for reference. <br />In summary, Staff is concerned that continuing the current sealcoat program without first identifying the root <br />cause(s) for pavement stripping is likely to result in additional damage to streets moving forward. Instead, Staff <br />would like to indefinitely suspend the sealcoating program while continuing to monitor the scope and severity of the <br />pavement stripping observed to date on City streets, to continue researching the sealcoat practices and findings of <br />other metro area cities and alternative treatments to sealcoating, and to determine how to best repair City streets <br />previously damaged by pavement stripping. Given the degraded condition of streets in Business Park 95, significant <br />repairs are likely needed this year. <br />Timeframe: <br />