My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 02/11/2020
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2020
>
Agenda - Council - 02/11/2020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 11:21:46 AM
Creation date
2/26/2020 11:00:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
02/11/2020
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
808
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Using cores from a two (2) year old fog seal and the lab permeability (ASTM PS 129-1) test <br />method it was demonstrated that fog seal did not allow water in liquid state to infiltrate the HMA <br />but allowed water in a vapor state to escape. (See Appendix C). <br />Figure 3: Nuclear density tester. <br />Task 4 <br />In Task 4 current methods used by cities to construct their streets was reviewed. These methods <br />were compared to MnDOT's standard specifications for paving. During discussion with agency <br />personnel one fact that relates to density became apparent. Most cities were using ordinary <br />compaction to obtain density. Ordinary compaction, when executed properly should yield good <br />density of the pavement. However, one issue with ordinary compaction is that contractor and <br />agency personnel must ensure that all areas of the pavement receive proper number of rolling <br />passes at proper temperature of asphalt mixture. When streets have variable widths and curves <br />are present it is more difficult to ensure the rolling pattern is consistent throughout asphalt <br />pavement placement. MnDOT recommends using specified density methods. With specified <br />density the agency will take cores randomly from pavement to verify that proper density has <br />been achieved (see Appendix D). <br />Task 5 <br />Analysis of the data collected in Task 3 was discussed and presented in Task 5. Using the <br />different methods outline above, it was shown that all the test methods correlated. The data <br />showed that streets had high variability in density from 7 to 12 percent air voids in areas close <br />stripped areas. In the areas with severe stripping cores were not able to be retained for testing. <br />This was due to the cores breaking into many pieces after pulling the core from the pavement. <br />Nuclear density testing showed great amount of variability in the mix weight per cubic foot from <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.