Laserfiche WebLink
Introduction: In recent years, Mn/DOT has received reports of stripping, or <br />deterioration, of the upper'/2 to 1 inch of hot mixed asphalt (HMA) pavements under <br />chip seal surface treatments. This distress (Figure 4) usually starts out as a small <br />blister and develops to small potholes, at which point the chip seal delaminates from the <br />pavement. These distresses can become an expensive maintenance problem. These <br />distresses could also impede the deployment of cost saving preventive maintenance <br />(PM) treatments if the treatments are viewed as the cause of the distresses. <br />Figure 1. Early stage of HMA deterioration under a chip seal (251 Reid). <br />This report represents task 1 of the Minnesota Local Road Research Board (LRRB) <br />project number 2010-042, entitled, "Stripping of Hot Mixed Asphalt Pavements under <br />Chip Seals". The overall goal of this research project is to determine the underlying <br />cause of the stripping distresses, identifying which pavements are at greatest risk and <br />implement risk mitigation strategies that include improved specifications and practices. <br />The main purpose of this task report was to identify the extent of the problem among <br />local government entities. <br />Minnesota cities and counties were asked to complete an online survey, using the <br />Survey Monkey TM tool, describing their experience with the stripping under chip seal <br />distress. Appendix A is a draft of the survey that was used to populate Survey <br />Monkey TM. The survey opened for response in early September and received 66 <br />responses. <br />Findings and Observations: The survey responses show that the problem of stripping <br />of the HMA under a chip seal happens in over 60% of the agencies that responded. <br />The first chip seals were applied when the streets were between four (4) and eight (8) <br />years of age. The distress seems to appear between two (2) to four (4) years after chip <br />seal application. Note that 60 percent of respondents reported that they did not have <br />un-chip sealed roadways the same age as the chip sealed roadways. The ninth <br />question asked for comments. Appendix A lists all the comments received. Below are <br />a few selected comments. <br />A-2 <br />