Laserfiche WebLink
Chapter 2. Laboratory Testing and Evaluation <br />Introduction <br />There is no one test that is universally accepted as an indicator of stripping potential, <br />some tests worked well on some materials and not on others. One of the goals of this project is to <br />provide a test(s) that can be performed relatively inexpensively and provide results quickly and <br />accurately. With this in mind, excessive conditioning, such as multiple freeze -thaw cycles in the <br />Lottman test, is not being considered. Preference was given to accepted tests and methodologies <br />which could be implemented/performed with little investment. <br />In addition, an experimental plan was formulated based upon recent data findings from <br />forensic investigations of local streets. These forensic investigations revealed that pavements <br />with stripping problems also seemed to have high in -place air voids. All of them had in -place <br />voids greater than 10%, up to as high as 14%, other samples were unable to be tested due to <br />disintegration of the core during the coring operation. This led the researchers to hypothesize <br />that reduced density would lead to an increased susceptibility of the pavement to experience <br />moisture induced damage. <br />The hypothesis was tested by utilizing the current standard employed by Mn/DOT <br />(Lottman test with Mn/DOT modified conditioning), experimenting with the Asphalt Pavement <br />Analyzer (APA), or rutting test conducted on saturated and dry specimens as well as a new <br />method proposed by the researchers that involves immersing a sample into boiling water for a <br />pre -determined period of time (referred to as the modified boiling test)". <br />Laboratory Procedure and Test Results <br />Laboratory Permeameter (Karol -Warner flexible wall Permeameter) <br />The laboratory testing was conducted on a level 3 SuperPave mixture, derived from a <br />relatively common Minnesota job mix formula. This mixture has not been observed to be <br />susceptible to striping problems. The samples were sampled from the field and prepared in the <br />laboratory by trained Mn/DOT personnel using a SuperPave gyratory compactor. The mixture <br />had 30% RAP content, with 4.8% new asphalt binder and it conformed to Mn/DOT's gradation <br />requirements. <br />Permeability testing was accomplished using the laboratory Permeameter (Figure 2.1), <br />also known as the Karol -Warner flexible wall permeameter. The coefficient of water <br />permeability, k was found using the relationship described in Figure 2.1. <br />The coefficient of permeability provides an indication of the ease with which water can <br />pass through the specimen, higher values indicate that it's easier for water to flow through the <br />specimen and lower values indicate that it's more difficult for water to flow through the <br />specimen. According to the Mn/DOT pavement design manual, permeability for class 5 <br />aggregate base is approximately 4.8 inches per day (in/day) and drainable bases have <br />permeability values between 3,600 to 12,000 in/day. <br />B-9 <br />