My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 02/11/2020
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2020
>
Agenda - Council - 02/11/2020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 11:21:46 AM
Creation date
2/26/2020 11:00:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
02/11/2020
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
808
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
D \ 04E$0,4yO <br />Chapter 2. Minnesota Department of Transportation <br />a a <br />Cf <br />s '''oP TftP'4.- <br />Chapter 3. Memo <br />Office of Materials Office Tel: 651/366-5573 <br />1400 Gervais Avenue, Mail Stop 645 Fax: 651/366-5461 <br />Maplewood, MN 55109 <br />TO: Tom Tesch <br />DATE: July 17, 2012 <br />SUBJECT: Task 3 memo for LRRB 904 Stripping Under Chip Seal Study <br />This memo will document what was completed in Task 3 of the LRRB Research Project INV. <br />904 Stripping of Hot -Mix Asphalt Pavements under Chip Seals. Task 3 was to test cores from <br />city streets to test the hypothesis developed in Task 2. The hypothesis states that areas of low <br />density or high air voids in the asphalt pavements are the major contributing factor to stripping of <br />the Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) after a chip seal has been placed. <br />Numerous streets were reviewed and three (3) cities were picked for study, Brooklyn Center, <br />Eden Prairie and Woodbury. These cities were selected based on a significant amount of streets <br />having stripping issues. Selection of streets to evaluate and the evaluation procedures are <br />described below. <br />First a visual review with City Street Department personnel was conducted. Based on this <br />review, areas were selected for further evaluation. On the streets that had previously received a <br />chip seal, the following methods were used for evaluation. A nuclear density gauge was used to <br />perform a nuclear density test (NDT). The gauge was place on pavement close to the area of <br />stripping ensuring uniform contact from gauge and the street. Two (2) reading were taken at 90° <br />to each other (Figure 1). Then the gauge was placed as close to the stripped area as possible that <br />showed no sign of damage. Two (2) more tests were performed similarly as previously <br />described. This process continued until the complete paving pass had been tested. Then cores <br />were cut at same location as the NDT readings (Figure 2) <br />C-1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.