Laserfiche WebLink
D \4ES0,4yO <br />Chapter 6. Minnesota Department of Transportation <br />a a <br />Oc <br />s<N T1� .g <br />Chapter 7. Memo <br />Office of Materials Office Tel: 651/366-5573 <br />1400 Gervais Avenue, Mail Stop 645 Fax: 651/366-5461 <br />Maplewood, MN 55109 <br />TO: Tom Tesch T.L. <br />DATE: September 20, 2012 <br />SUBJECT: Task 5 for LRRB 904 Stripping Under Chip Seals <br />Background <br />Analysis of the data collected in Task 3 will be discussed and presented in Task 5. It was <br />shown in task 3 that all the tests, permeability, air voids, and density, correlated. The data <br />showed that streets had high variability in density from 7 to 12 percent air voids in areas close <br />to the stripped areas. <br />In the areas with severe stripping cores were not able to be retained for testing. This was due <br />to the cores disintegrating into many pieces after pulling the core from the pavement. Nuclear <br />density testing showed great amount of variability in the mix density from areas of not <br />stripping to areas suffering from stripping. One street had the density varied from 145 lbs/ft3 <br />in areas of the street with no issues to a low of 117.3 lbs/ft3 in areas experiencing stripping. <br />For field evaluation of streets the nuclear density tester is the fastest and easiest to use of <br />method tested. After discuss with experts from around the country it is recommend to not chip <br />seal a street if the variability in density varies more than 6 lbs. per cubic foot as measured with <br />nuclear density tester. <br />Data <br />Figure 1 shows that that when comparing the density to either air voids or lab permeability, the <br />correlation is similar. This indicates density, air voids, and lab permeability are correlated to each <br />other. As density increased and lab permeability and air voids decreased, less stripping was observed. <br />