Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Lind highlighted some of the recent public works projects that his team completed. <br />Councilmember Menth referenced the proposed schedule with the bid packet one proposed for <br />early May. He asked the percentage of the specifications and dimensions that would be provided <br />in the bid documents. <br />Mr. Lawrence stated that bid pack one would be proposed to be issued in mid to late June and <br />would be a core and shell building set that would include a lot of details. <br />Mr. Lind stated that the purpose of that set of bids is to ensure you can order the precast panels. <br />He noted that the more detailed construction information would be included in bid pack two. <br />Public Works Superintendent Riemer asked what opportunity the City would have to purchase <br />equipment off the State bid. <br />Mr. Lind stated that Wright County looked at purchasing lifts off the State contract but ended up <br />not choosing that option. He identified some items that could possibly be purchased off the State <br />bid. <br />Ms. Isola noted that some furniture packages are available on the State contract. <br />Mr. Barickman asked the biggest challenge to stay on schedule, or potential risks with the <br />schedule. <br />Mr. Lind stated that the biggest challenge is that the schedule is very aggressive. He stated that <br />once a firm is brought on board, he would recommend a meeting to ensure everyone is ready to <br />move and stay on pace. He noted that if the City is ready to go and make decisions, this team <br />would be committed to meeting the desired schedule. <br />Councilmember Heinrich asked if geotechnical evaluation is included in the bid price. <br />Mr. St. Martin stated that is not included in the scope and estimated $10,000 to $15,000. <br />Councilmember Riley commended staff for narrowing it down to these two qualified candidates, <br />noting that he would be comfortable with either candidate, and would welcome input from staff. <br />Councilmember Heinrich stated that both teams mentioned doing site tours and asked if the City <br />would entertain that as they have already toured facilities. <br />Public Works Superintendent Riemer confirmed that staff would be open to that. <br />Mr. Barickman noted that one component that he noticed was different from the two proposals <br />was that Oertel did not include furniture, fixtures and equipment while HCM did include that <br />element. <br />Councilmember Kuzma stated that he preferred HCM. <br />City Council Work Session / January 28, 2020 <br />Page 4 of 6 <br />