My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 02/11/2020
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2020
>
Agenda - Council - 02/11/2020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 11:21:46 AM
Creation date
2/26/2020 11:00:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
02/11/2020
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
808
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CHAPTER 4: CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br />4.1 CONCLUSIONS <br />The field and laboratory work conducted in this project represents an extensive study of chip -sealed <br />pavement performance in Minnesota. In spite of this effort, many concerns surrounding the behavior <br />chip -sealed pavements remain unresolved. <br />First, the study was not able to verify the conclusion of earlier MnDOT research that high air voids is the <br />primary cause of stripping (Wood & Cole, 2013). High air voids were not observed in the locations used <br />for the study; furthermore, not all chip -sealed pavements considered in the study exhibited signs of <br />stripping. The latter observation agrees with municipal experience: survey data indicated that 74 <br />percent of city engineers did not identify stripping in chip seals as a major issue. <br />The study was also unable to identify mix design or construction practices that correlated with the <br />incidence of stripping. That is, based on the results of this study: <br />• There does not appear to be direct relationship between pavement density and stripping <br />under chip seals. <br />• There does not appear to be a direct relationship between any specific bituminous mixture, <br />contractor, geographic location, or year of construction and this distress. <br />The main conclusion of the study is that while stripping under chip seals is a concern, it is not a concern <br />that can be addressed with a simple mix design or paving rule of thumb. <br />Finally, the distress was observed to be a complex phenomenon that may be caused by the presence of <br />the chip seal as much as it is the composition of the underlying asphalt. Perhaps the matrix of binder <br />and densely packed, angular chip creates too tight of a "seal" on the pavement, thereby trapping <br />moisture and vapor and creating conditions that become damaging under freeze -thaw action. It is <br />hoped that the field and laboratory data collected in this study will be of value to future work that <br />examines this phenomenon in detail. <br />4.2 RECOMMENDATIONS <br />Based on field observations and discussions with state, city, and county engineers, the following <br />recommendations and observations are provided on the use of chip -seal treatments and the incidence <br />of stripping under chip seals. As the study was unable to point to an overwhelming cause for the <br />stripping behavior, the recommendations are intended to be a starting point for future discussions and <br />studies of important issues in the use of chip seals. <br />First, it was observed that stripping behavior under chip seals may be due to trapped moisture and <br />water vapor between the chip seal and the asphalt pavement. This phenomenon would be similar to <br />37 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.