My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 02/11/2020
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2020
>
Agenda - Council - 02/11/2020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 11:21:46 AM
Creation date
2/26/2020 11:00:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
02/11/2020
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
808
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RespondentlD <br />StartDate <br />Is there anything else you'd like to share about your use or non-use of chipseals? <br />4273372900 <br />10/21/2015 <br />Almost appears to be worse on roads with multiple chip seals. Maybe something to do <br />with moisture getting trapped between the chip seal and the wear course. <br />4273395006 <br />10/21/2015 <br />Based on analysis done on our streets by Tom Wood @ MnDOT, the failure seems to <br />be due to high air voids in the wearing course (possibly due to poor compaction). <br />4273399156 <br />10/21/2015 <br />Chip seal stripping, from our experience, has been late in the chip seal's life (year 5-7). <br />Our specification on tack material is for a CRS-2P/CRS-2 (MnDOT Spec 3151) with an <br />FA-2 Modified 1/8" aggregate. Not entirely sure if the CRS-2P/CRS-2 material is a <br />polymer modified emulsion or not. <br />4278472353 <br />10/23/2015 <br />I have observed that the quantity of road salt that is placed on the road in the winter, <br />affects the amount and area where stripping failure occurs. Please contact me if you <br />would like to discuss. By Paul Pearson, PE, Sambatek, Inc. (ppearson@sambatek.com) <br />4274077158 <br />10/21/2015 <br />I have told our City Council for last 2 years that we no longer should do seal coating. <br />No plans to start it up again. <br />4273391423 <br />10/21/2015 <br />I'm torn between answering number 6 as "unknown" instead of "no." Most of our <br />roads built since the 90s have been chip sealed. The roads which haven't been chip <br />sealed are really old roads built in the 80s (or earlier) that are now dilapidated in more <br />ways than one. <br />4274626934 <br />10/21/2015 <br />In general, Albert Lea has not experienced a problem with this. <br />4273379811 <br />10/21/2015 <br />In regard to 6, we have limited number of non seal coated streets thus no answer. We <br />have experienced striping below seal coat on streets paved around 1997 which is prior <br />to us specifying anti strip additives in the bit pavement mix. The seal coats on those <br />streets appeared to do little to prevent stripping in the mix. <br />4273428867 <br />10/21/2015 <br />Lakeville has gone away from the use of chip seals primarily because of the raveling <br />issue, but also because we have we have started using c-oil with our bituminous mix <br />designs, and have seen less thermal cracking, and therefore can better manage surface <br />failures with crack filling alone. <br />4273512769 <br />10/21/2015 <br />LOIS VI IFIIV aL)Vul. FIVrl-use ula[ I WVulu love 10 Snare! nVWever, we use VI UIIp seals <br />should all come down to a simple question: did the use extend the life of a street and <br />safe money. In most cases and in my opinion, it cost cities millions more to use a chip <br />seal vs. not using them. Even if there was just minor stripping and potholes, that cost <br />still negates the benefits of using a chip seal. There are many cities that have not used <br />chip seals and instead put the same money into crack filling and overlays. Their streets <br />look great and they are not looking at spending millions to correct a problem that <br />nobody can with 100% certainty tell us how to correct. If this answer to this question <br />was known, Klayton would not have had to send this survey out. <br />4274195066 <br />10/21/2015 <br />Not finding chipseals indicated for the distresses associated with local roads. Our focus <br />is on routing and sealing cracks and reserving resources for thin overlays to extend <br />pavement life when patching/ride/visuals prompt complaints. There is discussion from <br />time to time whether some sort of surface treatment is desired by the community for <br />aesthetic purposes. <br />4276394004 <br />10/22/2015 <br />Only 3 projects done-2008, 2014 & 2015. These are thin sealcoats with a fine FA-2 trap <br />rock. <br />4273380854 <br />10/21/2015 <br />Our focus is now on mill and overlay as we are dedicating more money to addressing <br />the chip seal issue. <br />4273393443 <br />10/21/2015 <br />Past practice was to chipseal to the amount budgeted, which resulted in a 50 year <br />rotation on bit streets. We now budget based on a goal of 7 year rotation, with a <br />budget reality of about 12. <br />4273378017 <br />10/21/2015 <br />Since chip seals have not been used in over 20 years, streets that were sealed have <br />since been overlaid or reconstructed. Not able to give condition related to stripping as <br />a result. <br />K-10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.