My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 02/11/2020
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2020
>
Agenda - Council - 02/11/2020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 11:21:46 AM
Creation date
2/26/2020 11:00:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
02/11/2020
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
808
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmember introduced the following resolution and moved for its adoption: <br />RE SOLUTION #20-031 <br />RESOLUTION TO HIRE A PART-TIME COMMUNITY SERVICE OFFICER <br />WHEREAS, there is a Community Service Officer vacancy; and <br />WHEREAS, an internal and external recruitment process was conducted; and <br />WHEREAS, Mr. Nolan Goebel has been selected as the top candidate for the position <br />averaging 25 hours per week; and <br />WHEREAS, staff has completed the necessary background checks and is recommending <br />that Mr. Nolan Goebel be hired as a part-time Community Service Officer at $20.53 per hour <br />effective on or near Wednesday, February 12, 2020; and <br />WHEREAS, Mr. Nolan Goebel will be subject to a 6-month probationary period, the <br />City's Personnel Policy and AFSCME union contract. <br />NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF <br />RAMSEY, ANOKA COUNTY, STATE OF MINNESOTA, as follows: <br />1) Motion to adopt resolution #20-031 hiring Mr. Nolan Goebel as a part-time Community <br />Service Officer working an average of 25 hours per week, effective on or near February <br />12, 2020 at $20.533 per hour, which is step 1 of the 2020 wage scale. <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember, <br />and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: <br />and the following voted against the same: <br />and the following abstained: <br />and the following were absent: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.