Resolution - #00-11-310 - 11/28/2000

Home

• of 570.55 feet; thence westerly along a tangential curve concave to the south having a radius of 656.16 feet, a central angel of 11 degrees 00 minutes 03 seconds a distance of 125.98 feet; thence South 78 degrees, 59 minutes 56 seconds, tangent to last said curve, a distance of 116.48 feet; thence southerly along a tangential curve, concave to the East having a radius of 295.97 feet, a central angle of 90 degrees 47 minutes 28 seconds a distance of 467.89 feet; thence South 11 degrees 47 minutes 32 seconds East, tangent to last said curve a distance of 164.54 feet; thence southerly and westerly along a tangential curve concave to the west having a radius of 295.27 feet, a central angle of 101 degrees 11 minutes 13 seconds, a distance of 521.46 feet; thence South 89 degrees 23 minutes 42 seconds West, tangent to last said curve a distance of 210.53 feet and said centerline there terminating. (" Subject Property" ) 4. That the Applicant is proposing to develop a multi - family housing project (twinhomes, quad - townhomes, and a four -plex) on an 11.3 acre site which includes the Subject Property. 5. That 9 acres of the 11.3 acre project site is zoned R -3 Urban Residential, but the portion referenced above in the legal description as the Subject Property is zoned R -1 Urban Residential. 6. That the Subject Property to be rezoned is approximately 2.3 acres in size. 7. That the Subject Property is located within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) boundary. 8. That the abutting property to the north is zoned R -1 Urban Residential, the property to the west is zoned R -3 Urban Residential, the property to the south is zoned B -1 Business and the Subject Property is bounded by T.H. #47 on the east. 9. That the Applicant is proposing a development that is compatible with the 12/21/99 draft Comprehensive Plan that has been forwarded to Metropolitan Council for approval. 10. That the draft Comprehensive Plan was sent to the Met Council on December 21, 1999, and was not accepted as complete by the Met Council. 11. That the subsequent draft Comprehensive Plan was sent to the Met Council on July 21, 2000, and was accepted as complete on October 4, 1999. 12. That the July 21, 2000 Comprehensive Plan has not been approved by the Met Council. 13. That the 1980 Comprehensive Plan as amended in 1985 and 1995 does not include the proposed use on the easterly portion of the parcel. RESOLUTION #00 -11 -310 Page 2 of 3