My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 04/14/2005 - Joint with EPTF
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Parks and Recreation Commission
>
2005
>
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 04/14/2005 - Joint with EPTF
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2025 3:17:30 PM
Creation date
4/13/2005 2:49:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Parks and Recreation Commission
Document Title
Joint with EPTF
Document Date
04/14/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The preliminary plat is proposing to gain access from PotassiuTM Street. The public street servicing the <br />single family lots exceeds 600 feet in length and such deviation will need to be approved as part of the <br />acceptance of the PUD rezoning. <br /> <br />The City Attorney has determined that Potassium Street is a public street by virtue of it having been used <br />and kept in repair for at least six years and thus pursuant to Minn. Stat. 160.05 is deemed dedicated to <br />the public. However, Minn. Stat. 160.05 does not provide for the width of a dedicated street, but rather <br />its width is dictated by the area actually maintained by the City and used by the public. A copy of Minn. <br />Stat. 160.05 is attached. In 1982 the then City Administrator signed and recorded an affidavit indicating <br />that the City was maintaining the street at a 66 foot wide width. A copy oftha, t affidavit is attached. <br /> <br />City Code requires 20% public open space or 50% private Open space for developments' 'that area' <br />processed through a PUD. The development is proposing 59% private open space, it should be noted that <br />only 50% credit was given to the wetlands (which is consistent with credit giyen, when calculating public <br />open space area).. <br /> <br />A traffiC' generation analysis study for .th~ proposed residential devolopment h~ been initiated, The <br />pla~ement of counterJ 'in the field was postponed due to District #I1 spring break.~12 the event <br />preliminary information is available at the Planning Commission meeting, staff will verbaily report such' <br />findings tothe commission. <br /> <br />The land. scape plan is acceptable in accordance with the comments outlined in the StaffReview Letter. <br /> <br />The grading and drainage plan will need to be revised in accordance with comments outlined in the Staff <br />Review Letter. , <br /> <br />The property contains several wetlands that will need to be protected. Staff is recommending that the <br />developer establish a "No Mow" or wetland buffer line. This will help establish the area that ~shotild' be <br />manicured and what area should remain in its natural state., Staff is also requesting, that the developer <br />plant appropriate seeding specifications within a portion of the nO mow zone to further establish and <br />protect the wetland areas. " .- <br /> <br />The ~proposed plat ¢vit! .be-revi%wgd fo~.p'ark dedicat, ipn .requirements bY the park Commission at their <br />April 14, 2005 meeting. Staff anticipates that the"Parl~ CommisSion will recommend' park dedication be <br />safist..ied~ through a cash payment. . <br /> <br />Recommendation: <br /> <br />The, Planning Commission should review the Staff ReView Letter dated April i, 2005 in great-detail ahd <br />determine if the development is reflective of the concerns that were expressed dhring sketch plan review. <br /> <br />Commission Action: <br /> <br />Motion to recommend that the City Council approve the preliminary plat contingent'upon compliance <br />with City Staff Review Letter dated April 1, 2005 and upon receiving a rezoning to PUD. <br /> <br />- and- <br /> <br />Motion to recommend that the City Council approve the site plan contingeht upon compliance with City <br />Staff Review Letter dated April 1, 2005. <br /> <br />48 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.