My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 04/02/2020
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2020
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 04/02/2020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 11:04:50 AM
Creation date
3/31/2020 9:40:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
04/02/2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RELEVANT LINKS: <br />III. Legal standards <br />When considering a variance application, a city exercises so-called "quasi- <br />judicial" authority. This means that the city's role is limited to applying the <br />legal standard of practical difficulties to the facts presented by the <br />application. The city acts like a judge in evaluating the facts against the legal <br />standard. If the applicant meets the standard, then the variance may be <br />granted. In contrast, when the city writes the rules in zoning ordinance, the <br />city is exercising "legislative" authority and has much broader discretion. <br />A. Practical difficulties <br />"Practical difficulties" is a legal standard set forth in law that cities must <br />apply when considering applications for variances. It is a three -factor test <br />and applies to all requests for variances. To constitute practical difficulties, <br />all three factors of the test must be satisfied. <br />1. Reasonableness <br />The first factor is that the property owner proposes to use the property in a <br />reasonable manner. This factor means that the landowner would like to use <br />the property in a particular reasonable way but cannot do so under the rules <br />of the ordinance. It does not mean that the land cannot be put to any <br />reasonable use whatsoever without the variance. For example, if the variance <br />application is for a building too close to a lot line or does not meet the <br />required setback, the focus of the first factor is whether the request to place a <br />building there is reasonable. <br />2. Uniqueness <br />The second factor is that the landowner's problem is due to circumstances <br />unique to the property not caused by the landowner. The uniqueness <br />generally relates to the physical characteristics of the particular piece of <br />property, that is, to the land and not personal characteristics or preferences <br />of the landowner. When considering the variance for a building to encroach <br />or intrude into a setback, the focus of this factor is whether there is anything <br />physically unique about the particular piece of property, such as sloping <br />topography or other natural features like wetlands or trees. <br />League of Minnesota Cities Information Memo: 1/11/2019 <br />Land Use Variances Page 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.