Laserfiche WebLink
Commissioner Anderson suggested that there be a worksession before the next meeting to allow <br />additional discussion. <br />Senior Planner McGuire Brigl stated that she can schedule a worksession for signage. She noted <br />that the applicant has some urgency because of potential tenants. <br />Chairperson Bauer stated that it seems the consensus would be a community sign on City <br />property or a comparable sign (to Armstrong Retail) on private property. <br />Motion by Commissioner Anderson, seconded by Commissioner VanScoy, to table the request <br />and allow the applicant time to revise the proposal for consideration at a future meeting. <br />Further discussion <br />Commissioner Johnson requested that the worksession occur at least one week prior to the <br />regular Planning Commission meeting. He thanked Mr. Hardy for his input tonight. <br />Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Bauer, Commissioners Anderson, VanScoy, Gengler, <br />Johnson, Peters, and Woestehoff Voting No: None. Absent: None. <br />Mr. Kuker stated that he also owns the land at Armstrong and Bunker, and if off -premise signs <br />are allowed, he could potentially make that retail and post signage along Highway 10. He just <br />wanted to ensure the Commission thinks about precedent that could be set. <br />6. COMMISSION BUSINESS <br />6.01: Consider Amended Sketch Plan for Odyssey Homes; Case of Odyssey Homes <br />(Project No. 19-140) <br />Presentation <br />Senior Planner McGuire Brigl presented the Staff Report stating that staff recommends that the <br />applicant proceed to the Preliminary Plat phase with revisions outlined in the staff review files. <br />She stated that a letter of opposition was included in the case. <br />Commission Business <br />Commissioner Gengler asked the cul-de-sac standards. <br />Senior Planner McGuire Brigl commented that the standard would be 600 feet for cul-de-sac <br />length. <br />Commissioner VanScoy stated that he does not recall a 900-foot cul-de-sac length for this type of <br />density, although there are R-1 developments with longer cul-de-sacs. <br />Planning Commission/ February 6, 2020 <br />Page 13 of 18 <br />