Laserfiche WebLink
While a request for an oversized ground size is not necessarily unusual, the square footage proposed with this <br />request is larger than contemplated in previous discussions. As a result, Staff is in need of some policy direction <br />from the Planning Direction before any specific recommendation can be provided. While Staff understands the <br />Planning Commission desires to broaden the scope of administrative approvals for signs, this size is larger than <br />what had been discussed in the past, and larger than Staff is comfortable with approving administratively at this <br />time. Staff is understanding of the desire for visibility from Highway 10 for businesses and does believe that <br />signage could help attract businesses to the area. <br />Action: <br />Motion to recommend that the City Council approve/modify/deny the request for a Conditional Use Permit for a <br />larger sign. <br />-OR- <br />Motion to postpone action on this case to obtain additional information and/or alternatives. <br />Attachments <br />Site Location Map <br />Proposed Sign <br />Sign Viewshed Exhibit <br />Exhibit Showing Locations of Existing or Approved Oversized Ground Signs Near Overpass <br />Letters of Opposition <br />The COR Design Framework <br />DRAFT Resolution #20-027 <br />Form Review <br />Inbox Reviewed By Date <br />Tim Gladhill Tim Gladhill 01/31/2020 02:12 PM <br />Form Started By: Chris Anderson Started On: 01/27/2020 09:51 AM <br />Final Approval Date: 01/31/2020 <br />