Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />Councilmember Riley commented that it appears that the driveway ownership is split equally <br />between Blue Velvet and the strip mall. He asked if the City has spoken with the owner of the <br />strip mall. <br /> <br />Public Works Superintendent Riemer stated that staff has not yet spoken with the strip mall <br />owner. <br /> <br />Councilmember Riley stated that does not want the City to own/purchase that area. <br /> <br />Chairperson Kuzma stated that he would think the owners of the two properties would want to <br />work together to provide access to their customers. <br /> <br />Councilmember Menth stated that he has been involved in a shared driveway agreement in the <br />past for a residential property. He commented that the only two parties involved in a shared <br />driveway are the owners and would not support the City purchasing that land to incur additional <br />maintenance costs. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Menth, seconded by Councilmember Riley, to decline the offer to <br />purchase/maintain Blue Velvet Lane and have it remain a private road. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Kuzma, Councilmembers Menth and Riley. Voting <br />No: None. <br /> <br />5.04: Discuss Options for Northern Nine (9) Acres of Lot 1, Block 1, Bury and Carlson <br />Addition (Future Public Works Campus Site and Economic Development Parcel) <br /> <br />Deputy City Administrator Gladhill reviewed the staff report. <br /> <br />Chairperson Kuzma noted that he and Councilmember Riley were in attendance at the EDA <br />meeting and therefore have already discussed this case. He commented that it makes a lot of <br />sense to provide the additional flexibility to the public works facility design process. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Menth, seconded by Councilmember Riley, to recommend that the <br />City Council revise the listing from nine acres to seven acres to allow flexibility in the final <br />Public Works Campus Design and direct staff to bring the topic back to the Committee for <br />additional review once the Feasibility Study for the new public works facility is completed. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Kuzma, Councilmembers Menth and Riley. Voting <br />No: None. <br /> <br />5.05: Consider Recommendation to City Council to Accept Feasibility Report for 2020 <br />Pavement Overlay Improvements, Improvement Project No. 20-02 <br /> <br />City Engineer Westby reviewed the staff report. <br /> <br />Public Works Committee / February 18, 2020 <br />Page 3 of 8 <br /> <br />