My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Parks and Recreation Commission - 02/13/2020
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Parks and Recreation Commission
>
2020
>
Minutes - Parks and Recreation Commission - 02/13/2020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 11:57:45 AM
Creation date
4/6/2020 9:07:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Parks and Recreation Commission
Document Date
02/13/2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
are proposed close to residential properties, people tend have concerns. The staff did a complex <br />matrix when the City went to find a location for the dog park. Expansion rather than developing <br />a new one might be worth the money. Residents tend to have concerns about loose dogs and <br />noise and traffic from people outside the area. They are also concerned with dog waste with <br />respect to groundwater impacts. Alpine Park has worked well, with no significant runoff to <br />streams. The siting of that worked out well. <br /> <br />City Council Liaison Musgrove stated she likes Alpine; it is one of the best active parks in the <br />City. She also asked about a separate entrance. <br /> <br />Parks & Assistant Public Works Superintendent Riverblood responded the existing dog park is a <br />pyramid shape. What is being proposed is using the back side of the westerly ballfields and the <br />landd. On the existing outfield <br />fences, those two gates would remain and one more would be added <br />proposal. <br /> <br />City Council Liaison Musgrove stated she would have concerns with an entrance on that side that <br />is not doubled. <br /> <br />Parks & Assistant Public Works Superintendent Riverblood responded that is certainly a <br />possibility. <br /> <br />City Council Liaison Musgrove stated a double exit is important with that second entrance. She <br />does like the idea of having it extended, as it goes with the park. <br /> <br />Chair <br />to provide a safety buffer. The existing fences will help leverage this project, though there will <br />still be significant fencing and gate costs. <br /> <br />Ms. Brockman stated a double gate would be great. <br /> <br />Parks & Assistant Public Works Superintendent Riverblood stated these projects will come back <br />for Commission input and project development. <br /> <br />5.03: Advance the Ford Brook Playground Renovation Project <br /> <br />Parks & Assistant Public Works Superintendent Riverblood stated the Commission has looked at <br />this project a few times already. A Listening Session with the neighbors was held in May 2019. <br />The plan calls for the existing playground equipment to be removed and turf to be installed in that <br />area. The playground would be moved closer to the center/south park of the park, and the <br />playground would also become ADA-compliant. Also proposed is a sheltered picnic area. The <br />table and bench would be made out of recycled plastics. The playground would be relocated from <br />a nearby regional park that is in fantastic condition. There would be separate play structures for <br />up to age 6 and then ages 6 to 12. Also included is a 4-bay swing and a large articulated balance <br />beam. The draft budget is approximately $71,000. <br /> <br />Park and Recreation Commission/February 13, 2020 <br />Page 5 of 10 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.