My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 03/24/2020
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2020
>
Agenda - Council - 03/24/2020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 1:44:13 PM
Creation date
4/8/2020 2:50:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
03/24/2020
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
502
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Name: Future Business Park Traffic Memorandum <br />Date: January 27, 2017 <br />Page: 5 <br />Mitigation includes the lanes and traffic control indicated in the recommendations but <br />also includes a third southbound lane along Armstrong Blvd from Bunker Lake Blvd to <br />the Highway 10 North Ramp terminal. Additional review of the bridge design indicates <br />that a third lane would not be feasible without substantial revisions to the bridge <br />structure over the railroad. Based on this, two eastbound through lanes are <br />recommended at the intersection of Armstrong Blvd and Bunker Lake Blvd to provide <br />an alternative route if needed. The analysis below also considers an eastbound free <br />right into the third lane. This is recommended to be a dual right turn when or if needed <br />based on traffic redistribution in the area. <br />The resulting queues are shown below for each movement at the intersection of <br />Armstrong Blvd and Bunker Lake Blvd. Dual eastbound right turn lanes would be <br />anticipated to have similar average queues and shorter max queues. The max queues <br />are anticipated to be less if there is traffic redistribution based on congestion. <br />Table 3: Design Year (2040) Armstrong Blvd & Bunker Lake with Proposed Lanes <br />Traffic Control Scenario <br />Peak Hour <br />Delay-LOS** <br />Max Approach Queue <br />Average <br />Queue (ft) <br />Max <br />Queue (ft) <br />**** <br />CSAH 83 (Armstrong Blvd) & CSAH 116 (Bunker Lake Blvd) <br />EBL <br />AM <br />41 <br />D <br />64 <br />122 <br />PM <br />37 <br />D <br />106 <br />191 <br />EBR <br />AM <br />3 <br />A <br />PM <br />47 <br />D <br />390 <br />916 <br />WBL <br />AM <br />45 <br />D <br />134 <br />215 <br />PM <br />131 <br />F <br />401 <br />915 <br />NBL <br />AM <br />84 <br />F <br />305 <br />412 <br />PM <br />52 <br />D <br />207 <br />307 <br />SBL <br />AM <br />31 <br />C <br />95 <br />145 <br />PM <br />46 <br />D <br />81 <br />128 <br />*Delay in seconds per vehicle <br />**Maximum delay and LOS on any approach and/or movement <br />***Limiting Movement is the highest delay movement. <br />****Max Queue refers to the 95% Queue (Passenger car stored length = 25 ft, Heavy vehicle stored length = 45 ft) <br />C. Special Considerations <br />1. The trips from specific developments to Puma and Bunker Lake Blvd have not been <br />analyzed. Trips to and from specific developments should be assigned to appropriate <br />roadways based on the development roadway design. This is especially important for trip <br />assignment at the intersection of Bunker Lake Blvd and Puma St. <br />2. Mitigation for intersections outside of the area due to development in the area have <br />not been completed. <br />'Omen & errk is equal egporturuty err1ptoye.r. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.