My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 03/24/2020
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2020
>
Agenda - Council - 03/24/2020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 1:44:13 PM
Creation date
4/8/2020 2:50:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
03/24/2020
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
502
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CC Regular Session 6. 2. <br />Meeting Date: 03/24/2020 <br />By: Chris Anderson, Community <br />Development <br />Information <br />Title: <br />Adopt Resolution #20-042 Postponing the Public Hearing for a Conditional Use Permit for a Ground Sign and Wall <br />Signage at 7800 Sunwood Drive NW <br />Purpose/Background: <br />Due to Emergency Declarations at the local, State and Federal Level, the City is postponing this Public <br />Hearing until further notice. New Public Hearing Notices will be provided. Staff will focus public hearings <br />on projects with urgent needs. <br />On January 17, 2020, New Horizon Real Estate Development 6, LLP (DBA New Horizon Academy) purchased <br />7800 Sunwood Drive (the "Subject Property"), former site of Stone Brook Academy. Subsequently, Spectrum Sign <br />Systems, Inc. (the "Applicant"), on behalf of New Horizon Academy (the "Property Owner"), submitted an <br />application on February 6, 2020 for a Conditional Use Permit to install an oversized ground sign and wall signage <br />on the Subject Property. <br />Notification: <br />The City attempted to send a mailing via Standard US Mail to property owners within 350 feet of the Subject <br />Property, as noted in the Anoka County Property Records, notifying them of a public hearing. The Public Hearing is <br />being conducted by the City Council, rather than Planning Commission, because there was an error in getting the <br />official notification to the Anoka Union Herald in time for the March Planning Commission meeting. <br />Observations/Alternatives: <br />The following was the background on the original case. <br />The Subject Property is about 0.84 acres in size and is located in the COR-2 sub -district, slightly east ofNorthstar <br />Marketplace (Coborn's anchored retail area). All of the surrounding properties are also in the COR-2 sub -district, <br />with the railroad tracks and Highway 10 south of the Subject Property. <br />Per the COR Design Framework, the COR-2 sub -district is where more conventional suburban development is <br />expected, rather than the neo-traditional development planned for the other sub -districts. Most of the sign <br />regulations for the COR-2 sub -district mirror that of the more standard B-1 and B-2 Business Districts, with only a <br />couple exceptions. Ground signs may be up to 100 square feet in area but they are restricted to a height of six (6) <br />feet (note that this would mean a ground that is five feet tall and twenty feet long would be permissible). Similarly, <br />wall signage is based on fifteen percent (15%) of the front facade of a building (just like in the Business Districts), <br />but at least fifty percent (50%) of the signage must be placed on the measured wall. Finally, under project signs in <br />the Design Framework, it is noted that a project sign (as written, this would include ground signs) shall not be in <br />addition to wall signage. <br />If the COR-2 sub -district is indeed where the more conventional suburban development is expected, the differences <br />in the aforementioned sign standards seem somewhat contradictory. Having a ground sign, as well as wall signage, <br />is very typical for suburban commercial developments. Similarly, a twenty-five (25) foot tall ground sign (which <br />would meet the standards of the Business Districts), near the southern boundary of the Subject Property and <br />presumably visible from Highway 10, also seems very typical for conventional suburban development. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.