My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 03/24/2020
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2020
>
Agenda - Council - 03/24/2020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 1:44:13 PM
Creation date
4/8/2020 2:50:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
03/24/2020
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
502
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner VanScoy stated that The COR is not intended to be the typical suburban <br />development and he is having difficulty continuing to support these types of requests. He <br />recognized that visibility is important for retail and commercial businesses along Highway 10. He <br />stated that although the master sign plan addresses that intent, it has not yet been accomplished. <br />He stated that he would support a monument sign along the highway that would be visible to <br />support these businesses, similar to the City signs near the rail station and Ramsey Boulevard. He <br />agreed that visibility is critical but did not believe that ending up with multiple signs is the <br />intention. <br />City Planner Anderson read language from The COR design framework related to allowed signage. <br />Commissioner VanScoy stated that he finds it difficult to support this situation. <br />Chairperson Bauer referenced the location of this property and the two vacant lots that have interest <br />from two potential businesses. He asked if there could be shared signage for those three parcels. <br />Senior Planner McGuire Brigl stated that the two vacant parcels are both owned by the City and <br />will come forward for a lot split and therefore the City could ask for shared signage at that time. <br />She stated that the City can still look into shared monument signage but that would be further into <br />the future. She reviewed the type of signage that could be approved administratively, noting that <br />this traditional ground sign would be preferred to what could be allowed under the Code. <br />Chairperson Bauer asked if the business would be open to building signage at this time and waiting <br />for the future development of the adjacent parcels in attempt for shared signage. <br />Mr. Tauscheck stated that while he understands the intent he could not speak for the business. <br />Commissioner Johnson asked why the business does not use one of the open spaces on the <br />Coborn's sign. <br />Mr. Tauscheck replied that there is another property owner and location for that sign, and it would <br />not be New Horizon' s space to take. <br />City Planner Anderson stated that he cannot speak for the management company for NorthStar <br />Marketplace, but he presumes that they are typically promoting businesses within their own project <br />space and not an adjacent parcel. He stated that potentially opens the discussion of off premise <br />signage that was discussed the previous month. <br />Commissioner Woestehoff stated that the information shows that the sign would be illuminated <br />and asked if that would be lit 24 hours per day. <br />Mr. Tauscheck replied that the illumination would be set on a timer and would be lit during set <br />hours. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.