My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 04/14/2020
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2020
>
Agenda - Council - 04/14/2020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 1:46:29 PM
Creation date
4/15/2020 2:53:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
04/14/2020
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
542
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4.2. b Alternative Reconstruction Method <br />To meet the required 9-ton design strength, the SFDR method requires a 10-inch section including <br />4-inches of new bituminous over 6-inches of SFDR. Alternatively, this design strength can be <br />achieved using a 14-inch section including 4-inches of new bituminous over 10-inches of class 5 <br />aggregate base. However, the downsides of using the 14-inch section are that project costs are <br />estimated to be 13-percent higher than the SFDR method since 6-inches of subgrade excavation <br />would be required, and material would need to be hauled off -site. All of the reclaim material would <br />also have to be stockpiled, and it is estimated an additional 5,800 CY of class 5 aggregate base <br />would be required. Additionally, excavating below existing subgrade would result in more impacts <br />to the existing ditches. For these reasons, Staff is recommending the SFDR method. <br />4.2. c Safety Improvements <br />4.2. c.lVariolite Street and 161st Avenue Pedestrian Crossing <br />The City has received several requests in recent years to improve pedestrian safety at the <br />intersection of Variolite Street and 161st Avenue, resulting in a review of pedestrian safety <br />concerns at this intersection by the Public Works Committee on May 16, 2017. At that time, based <br />on the geometries of the site and the minimal amount of pedestrians crossing Variolite Street, <br />improvements were not justified. It was recommended to take another look at this location when <br />Variolite Street came up for reconstruction, and to consider possible roadway improvements to <br />alleviate the geometric concerns of the site. <br />As part of this feasibility study, Staff conducted a pedestrian crossing study at the aforementioned <br />intersection. This study was completed following both MnDOT and FHWA safety guidelines as <br />well as the Highway Capacity Manual Level of Service Analysis at Uncontrolled Crossing <br />Locations. As in 2017, the recommendations of all these sources is to not improve the site with <br />marked crossing or signage alone, but to perform traffic calming of the road corridor. Staff has <br />determined the most effective method of traffic calming is to reduce vehicle speeds to 40 mph by <br />constraining lane and shoulder widths to meet MSA standards for a 40 mph rural road, in addition <br />to adding a concrete pedestrian refuge island at 161st Avenue. A figure of the proposed pedestrian <br />crosswalk improvements is included in Appendix A. <br />Staff therefore proposes to reduce drive lane widths to 11-feet, and shoulder widths to 6-feet, south <br />of 163rd Lane to meet MSA design standards for a 40 mph rural road. The installation of a concrete <br />pedestrian refuge island on the north leg of Variolite Street at 161st Avenue will allow pedestrians <br />to focus on one lane of traffic, safely cross that lane, then wait within the raised median island until <br />an acceptable gap is available to safely finish crossing the next lane of traffic. An additional benefit <br />is the shortened crossing times. ADA compliant pedestrian landings are proposed for all <br />crosswalks at this intersection. Staff met with MnDOT State Aid Staff to discuss the City's <br />proposed design. State Aid Staff agreed that a raised concrete pedestrian refuge island likely <br />provided the greatest safety benefit, but suggested considering mini -roundabouts instead. Staff <br />explored the mini -roundabout option, but due to right-of-way constraints, this option is not <br />considered feasible at this time. <br />Feasibility Report <br />Variolite Street Reconstruction <br />City of Ramsey Project No. 20-01 <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.