My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 04/14/2020
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2020
>
Agenda - Council - 04/14/2020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 1:46:29 PM
Creation date
4/15/2020 2:53:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
04/14/2020
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
542
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner VanScoy stated that he does not recall a 900-foot cul-de-sac length for this type <br />of density, although there are R-1 developments with longer cul-de-sacs. <br />Senior Planner McGuire Brigl provided input from the County comments related to Nowthen <br />and emergency access. <br />Commissioner Anderson stated that he does not believe he would support a 900-foot cul-de-sac. <br />Councilmember Musgrove stated that recently there was a requirement for a certain size for a <br />bus to turn around and asked that size. <br />City Planner Anderson explained that within the rural area a 65-foot radius is required and in the <br />urban area a 60-foot radius is required. <br />Senior Planner McGuire Brigl stated that she spoke with Public Safety and the comment was that <br />the cul-de-sac would need to be full-sized in order to accommodate larger vehicles (plows, <br />garbage trucks, etc.). <br />Commissioner VanScoy commented that the right-in/right-out option seems like it would be a <br />good compromise but would require a divider because people would attempt to turn in. He <br />assumed that most of the traffic leaving would be heading towards Highway 47. <br />Senior Planner McGuire Brigl stated that the applicant is going to propose a right exit only, <br />which has not yet been vetted by Anoka County. <br />Commissioner Woestehoff asked if the County concern would be the connection to 146' and <br />that traffic would cut through. <br />Senior Planner McGuire Brigl believed that the issue was with the spacing. <br />Commissioner Woestehoff suggested removing the connection to 146th which would eliminate <br />the cut through ability, making the access on Nowthen with the cul-de-sac at the other side of the <br />development. <br />Commissioner Anderson asked if the development checks all the boxes for R-2 and this type of <br />development. <br />Senior Planner McGuire Brigl confirmed that in general all the bulk standards are met with the <br />sketch plan, though items like storm water management, landscaping, density transitioning, <br />traffic, etc. will need to be addressed with the preliminary plat. <br />Jason Bebeau, 15363 Radium St NW, stated that as the developer his goal would be to have a <br />right on only onto CR 5, with no entrance into the development from CR 5. <br />Planning Commission/ February 6, 2020 <br />Page 14 of 18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.