Agenda - Council - 04/14/2020 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

that he has lived in his home for over 60 years and would hate to lose the home that he and his elderly mother live in because of the medical expenses and issues he has, when the sale of this property would resolve that issue. He recognized that there are issues with traffic because Ramsey is becoming a City rather than a little rural township. Chairperson Bauer explained the intent of a sketch plan, which allows the Commission and residents to provide input to the developer before additional expense is incurred developing the Preliminary Plat elements. Commissioner Anderson commented that the developer should proceed to Preliminary Plat but work with staff to address the questions raised tonight at the meeting and through the open house. Commissioner Peters asked what is keeping CR 5 from having the speed limit lowered, noting that there are now two elementary schools along that roadway. Commissioner Woestehoff stated that he had the same concern with Alpine and learned that a speed study could result in a higher speed limit posted, as the County will adjust to what drivers are driving. Senior Planner McGuire Brigl stated that she would speak with Public Works, as the City could send in a request to have the speed limit reviewed. Commissioner Gengler stated that this is a viable option for this site, and she likes the density, but the CR 5 piece is the problematic piece for her. Commissioner VanScoy stated that he is comfortable as long as there could be some type of access on the southern end, noting that he would prefer the right-in/right-out. He acknowledged that would be a decision of the County. He stated that the traffic on CR 5 is what it is and adding a few more vehicles will not significantly change the conditions. Ms. Hunter stated that there was discussion at the open house related to a left-hand turn lane northbound on CR 5 at 146th and asked if the City could ask the County about that option. She noted that this may be an opportunity for the developer to fund that improvement. Mr. Hampton thanked the Commission for providing him the opportunity to vent and for agreeing to allow the project to move forward. He stated that he has been trying to sell the land since May and the developer began this process with the City in September, so it can just be frustrating with the length of time needed for these types of projects to move ahead. Mr. Bebeau stated that he agrees that the left turn lane would be beneficial but did not believe that is an expense that the developer should pay for, as that would require widening CR 5. He recognized that the turn lane would benefit the hundreds of other homes in that area, rather than the additional 26 homes. He noted that type of expense would most likely kill this project. Planning Commission/ February 6, 2020 Page 16 of 18