My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 04/14/2020
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2020
>
Agenda - Council - 04/14/2020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 1:46:29 PM
Creation date
4/15/2020 2:53:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
04/14/2020
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
542
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
It was the consensus of the Council to continue to offer the option of a stipend or for members to <br />have the option to waive the stipend. <br />2.04: Round Up for Change Program <br />City Administrator Ulrich reviewed the staff report. <br />Councilmember Heinrich commented that she would support the program if it is an opt -in <br />program rather than an opt -out program. <br />Councilmember Musgrove stated that Ramsey pays a larger portion than other cities for Youth <br />First, along with the credit for the building lease. She stated that she would like to see the round <br />up program go forward to help defer the cash payment that the City contributes to the <br />organization. She commented that the residents pay taxes for high priority items such as roads <br />and public safety, rather than charity. She stated that the round up program would be an option <br />for residents to choose to contribute. She asked if the resident could choose to opt out at any <br />time, if the City chose the opt out program. She commented that an opt out program would seem <br />to have less paperwork and staff time. <br />City Administrator Ulrich confirmed that residents can choose to opt out at any time. <br />Councilmember Musgrove asked if the cost to the City is just the implementation cost or whether <br />there is an ongoing annual fee. <br />City Administrator Ulrich noted that staff could investigate whether there could be an annual <br />cost for the software. <br />Councilmember Riley stated that the case is written with the recommendation that the funds <br />generated from this program would reduce City expenditures. He stated that he does not agree <br />with that. He stated that a separate topic could be whether it is appropriate for the City to fund <br />charity. He explained that he would not want to collect these funds under the guise of charity <br />and use them to offset what the City would have already been paying. <br />Councilmember Kuzma stated that the City receives a lot of complaints on utility billing already <br />and therefore he would not support this program as it seems to be a low return on the investment <br />for the software. <br />Councilmember Menth stated that he would also vote against this program. <br />Councilmember Specht stated that he would support the program as written as it would allow <br />residents the choice to contribute to a community program. He stated that the choice could be <br />reevaluated after one or two years. <br />Councilmember Musgrove stated that people would make their own choice on whether or not <br />they want to contribute and the funds could be used to offset the contribution the City pays to <br />City Council Work Session / March 16, 2020 <br />Page 7 of 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.