Laserfiche WebLink
designates the subject property as Rural Reserve. Development of Sweet Bay Ridge with urban <br />services requires a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to change the subject property's land use <br />designation fi'om Rural Reserve to Low Density Residential. <br /> <br />Commnnity Development Director Trudgeon noted the Planning Commission reviewed the <br />sketch plan for Sweet Bay Ridge (aka Gun Club Property) at its January 6, 2005 meeting. At that <br />time, City Staff reported that any decision on the sketch plan may be premature as the <br />Comprehensive Plan amendment to consider extension of urban services to the northern areas of <br />the City is still in process. Per Staff's recommendation, action on the sketch plan was tabled <br />tmtil March to allow the City more time to work on the comprehensive plan amendment. <br />Community Development Director Trudgeon stated the City Council and Planning Commission <br />have met in joint work session twice to discuss the comprehensive plan amendment process. <br />Ideally, thc City would have completed the Comprehensive Plan rewrite prior to taking action on <br />th.c Comprehensive Plan Amendment requests for Sweet Bay Ridge and Brookfield. Oakwood <br />l~and l)evelopmcnt has exercised their right to apply for an amendment; therefore the City is <br />required to take action on the request in a timely manner, according to State Statute. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Trudgeon advised that Oakwood Land Development has <br />applied for sketch plan approval of Sweet Bay Ridge to develop 165 urban service single-family <br />residential lots on 102 acres on the property generally known as the St. Anthony Gun Club. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Trudgeon explained that the property is currently located in <br />the R-1 Rural Reserve district and the minimum lot size is 10 acres. If the property is approved <br />2)r developtnent with urban services, the net density allowed under R-1 is 3 units per acre. The <br />sketch plan reflects a gross density of 1.6 units per acre; and a net density of 2.2 units per acre <br />with wetlands factored out. All of the proposed lots appear to meet urban single-family <br />standards l'or lot width, size, and frontage on a public road. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Trudgeon noted there are substantial wetlands on the <br />proposed plat that will need to be delineated and encumbered with drainage and utility easements <br />on the preliminary and final plats. The grading and drainage plan will have to be reviewed and <br />approved by the Lower Rum River Water Management Organization (LRRWMO). The sketch <br />plan also identifies filling .36 acres of wetlands for roads. The Wetland Conservation Act <br />~:stablishcs a sequencing process for wetland filling. The LRRWMO is also responsible for <br />administration of the Wetland Conservation Act. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Trndgeon explained that because the proposed development <br />will d istu rb more than 80 acres of naturally vegetated and forested land, an environmental review <br />is required. An Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) will be required as a part of the <br />preliminary plat submittal. The property has been documented to contain contamination from <br />lead shot. This site will need to have the contamination removed as a condition for the approval <br />of this plat. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Trudgeon stated the current City Code requires density <br />transitioning between the project area and adjacent rural size lots. A Tree Preservation Plan will <br /> <br />Planning Commission/March 3, 2005 <br /> Page 3 of 22 <br /> <br /> <br />