My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
10/09/01
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
Finance Committee
>
Agendas
>
2000's
>
2001
>
10/09/01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/19/2025 4:05:15 PM
Creation date
5/13/2003 2:46:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Document Title
Finance Committee
Document Date
10/09/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CONSIDER LIQUIDATED DAMAGES CLAIM <br />AGAINST EBERT CONSTRUCTION CO. <br /> RE: CONSTRUCTION OF FIRE STATION H <br /> <br />By: <br /> <br />William K. Goodrich, City Attorney <br /> and <br /> Dean Kapler, Fire Chief <br /> <br />Background: On September 20, 2001 the City Attorney and Fire Chief met with representatives of <br />Ebert Construction Company ("Ebert") and SEH Architects ("SEH") in an informal mediation <br />session. The purpose of which was to attempt to settle the liquidated damages issue without going <br />through the expense of formal mediation and/or arbitration as called for in the contract between the <br />parties. <br /> <br />Briefly, the facts of the claim are as follows: Ebert had 240 days from April 17, 2000 to construct <br />the Fire Station. This would mean a completion date of December 14, 2000. SEH contends that <br />Ebert did not achieve substantial completion, as defined by the contract until March 12, 2001. Ehert <br />asserts this was done by January 31, 2001. Ebert argues various things, but primarily that SEH <br />gave it time extensions, both orally and written as a result of change orders approved during the <br />contract. SEH initially took the position that Ebert was late by 87 days (December 14, 2000 to <br />March 12, 2000). At $500.00/day this equates to total liquidated damages of $43,500.00. <br />Unfortunately, in the City Attorney's preparation for the mediation he discovered 15 days extension <br />which SEH approved in writing and Ebert presented another writing signed by SEH which grants <br />another 12 day extension. SEH argues that possible extenuating circumstances could defeat this <br />additional 12 days. Nevertheless, Ebert puts forth a reasonable argument that it was granted in <br />writing a 27 day extension. Accepting this as true, the arguable days are down to 60 or $30,000.00. <br />Ebert, of course, disputes this amount. <br /> <br />Staff recommends a deduct of $17,000.from the Ebert final payment as a final settlement of this <br />claim. The rationale behind this recommendation is that in a contested arbitration, the City's legal <br />fees, architect fees and in house time will cost the City close to $10,000.00. Our experience is that <br />the arbitrator will give neither side everything it wants and try to compromise the amount, which <br />could be say $15,000.00 to the City. Assuming that to be true, the City will need to spend <br />$10,000.00 to get $15,000.00. Therefore, a $17,000.00 cash settlement as a deduct from the Ebert <br />contract seems to be the most cost effective way to settle this matter. Ebert will accept this deduct <br />amount. <br /> <br />Enclosure: <br /> <br />City Attorney's background letter dated August 10, 2001. <br /> <br />Recommendation: <br /> <br />Staff recommends agreeing upon $17,000.00 in liquidated damages as a deduct fi:om the Ebert <br />contract. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.