Laserfiche WebLink
clarify some misunderstanding that may exist. She stated that perhaps the 55 lots against Variolite <br />would be an issue and would encourage 80-foot lots and buffering in that area. <br />Commissioner Peters stated that he lives in Brookfield, noting that the previously existing <br />homeowners' association has been disestablished. He stated that he has lived in a range of housing <br />products and in different areas and therefore has a wide understanding of different living <br />arrangements. He commented that some people desire different things. He stated that sometimes <br />an 80-foot lot is more than some people can handle and maintain. He commented that you are not <br />able to pick your neighbors and sometimes smaller lots are easier for some to maintain in a well - <br />kept manner. He stated that perhaps a single parent desires a smaller lot with less maintenance. <br />Commissioner Woestehoff stated that he finds himself in a position of compromise quite a bit and <br />supports the element of affordable housing. He stated that the more different the people around <br />you are, the better person you ultimately become. He stated that to say that a home valued at <br />$350,000 is low income housing is absurd and it is helpful to have variety in housing. He <br />commented that he does not believe that an R-2 zoning would be appropriate but would continue <br />to support R-1 zoning. He commented that he wants to see the park and other elements remain. <br />He stated that he would love to see a compromise to bring diversity to the development. <br />Chairperson Bauer clarified that R-1 villas would support 65-foot lots, rather than the 55-foot lots <br />supported by R-2. <br />Commissioner Woestehoff encouraged the Commission to remember that a lot of time has been <br />spent on this case and he would encourage a decision rather than tabling. <br />Senior Planner McGuire Brigl stated that regardless of the direction tonight, staff plans to bring <br />this forward to the City Council at the May 26th meeting for input. <br />Commissioner VanScoy asked if input has been received from all the Commissioners. <br />Commissioner Johnson commented that he would be in favor of smaller lots but in respect to the <br />Comprehensive Plan and comments of the neighbors he would support 80-foot lots. He stated that <br />he lives on a 66-foot lot in the Woodlands and loves it, often seeing wildlife in his yard. He stated <br />that based on the feedback and intent of the Comprehensive Plan he would support 80-foot lots. <br />Commissioner VanScoy stated that he has no problem with smaller lots in certain areas, closer to <br />Highway 10. He commented that as you move out from that corridor and into the rural area, the <br />intent for the parcel was to have 80-foot lots and he would support that. He stated that this area is <br />intended to transition to rural and he would like it to remain that way. <br />Motion by Commissioner Johnson, seconded by Commissioner VanScoy, to recommend that City <br />Council deny Ordinance #20-07 approving a Zoning Amendment for the Makowsky Property for <br />The Excelsior Group. <br />Further discussion <br />Planning Commission/ May 7, 2020 <br />Page 20 of 29 <br />