Laserfiche WebLink
Planner McGuire Brigl stated that the information from tonight's meeting would be presented. <br />Deputy City Administrator Gladhill stated that the input would be gathered from the Council as <br />well, before the developer attempts to amend their sketch plan. <br />A roll call vote was performed by the Deputy City Administrator: <br />Commissioner Gengler aye <br />Commissioner Johnson nay <br />Commissioner Anderson aye <br />Commissioner Woestehoff aye <br />Commissioner Peters aye <br />Commissioner VanScoy nay <br />Chairperson Bauer aye <br />Motion carried. <br />5.04: Public Hearing: Consider Recommendations Related to Hunt Property Development <br />Proposal (Project No. 20-105); Case of Platinum Land, LLC <br />• Public Hearing: Consider Ordinance #20-08 Rezoning Hunt Property from R- <br />1 Residential (MUSA) District to R-1 Residential (Detached Villa) District and <br />R-1 Residential (Detached Villas) District <br />• Review Sketch Plan (Major Subdivision) <br />Public Hearing <br />Chairperson Bauer called the public hearing to order at 10:34 p.m. <br />Presentation <br />Senior Planner McGuire Brigl presented the staff report stating that since this is a legislative <br />(policy) decision of the City due to the fact that the request requires a zoning amendment, staff <br />needs broad policy direction before formulating a recommendation. The Planning Commission <br />should provide feedback on moving the project forward to Preliminary Plat. This is a key time in <br />the project to make major layout changes, provide feedback on lot sizes, road alignment, trails, <br />etc. before the Developer incurs expense of detailed civil engineering drawings. Staff does believe <br />there is room to compromise on the mix of lot sizes. Based on the 60 Day Rule, Ordinance #20- <br />08 does need to move forward to the City Council. If approved, the Ordinance would be contingent <br />upon approval of a future Preliminary Plat and tied to this project specifically. The Planning <br />Commission would request that the applicant provide an additional 60 Day Extension to provide <br />additional time for discussion, negotiation, and compromise. This would require written <br />confirmation by the Developer. Staff is hopeful that the Developer would be willing to provide an <br />additional extension if the City desires to explore a compromise concept plan. <br />Commissioner VanScoy asked the purpose of comments through a citizen survey. <br />Planning Commission/ May 7, 2020 <br />Page 22 of 29 <br />