Laserfiche WebLink
development of the property, similar to a situation that occurred on another property in the area 15 <br />years ago that remains undeveloped today. <br />Chad Lindgren, 5561 145t' Circle NW, stated that he has seen some change in the area in the 15 <br />years he has lived on his property. He stated that he does not want to see someone not have the <br />ability to sell and develop their land. He believed that there is something that can be done to <br />develop the property but believed that it would have to work for both the residents and developer. <br />He commented that while he would love to see trees preserved, he would not want to see the access <br />moved closed to CR 5. He agreed that perhaps moving the construction entrance off CR 5 would <br />make sense. He stated that location and density of the trees are both important. He noted that he <br />would want to see trees both on the front and back of the property. He stated that on his cul-de- <br />sac there are some two-story homes and some single -story and therefore had some concern with <br />two-story townhomes. He noted that perhaps there could be some slab homes transitioning to the <br />two-story townhomes. <br />Commissioner VanScoy asked if the turn lane issue has been addressed by the developer. <br />City Planner McGuire Brigl noted that the comments were provided to the developer and shared <br />with the developer' s engineer. She stated that perhaps the developer is awaiting input from the <br />Commission before asking for their engineer to make additional changes. <br />Chairperson Bauer commented that he feels that the best solution to move forward would be to <br />hold a worksession with the developer and neighbors prior to the February meeting to allow more <br />open dialogue. <br />Commissioner Anderson commented that this is a good project that he would like to see continue <br />to move forward but has some concerns. He encouraged the neighbors to attend the open <br />house/worksession prior to the February meeting to provide additional input. <br />Ms. Hunter asked if anything is known about this developer and their experience. She stated that <br />she was unable to find a website and would like to see assurance that this would be a quality <br />development. <br />City Planner McGuire Brigl stated that the developer does not yet have a website or finished <br />products. She commented that the developer has built homes but did not believe they have <br />completed a full development as of yet. <br />Commissioner VanScoy stated that he is comfortable with the general approach and supports the <br />open house concept. <br />Commissioner Gengler commented that she also believes that this would be a good project and <br />improvements have been made since the last review. She agreed with the concerns regarding <br />access, CR 5, and the trees and buffers. She agreed that the open house meeting would be helpful. <br />Chairperson Bauer confirmed that this would move forward to an open house meeting prior to the <br />regular February meeting. <br />