Laserfiche WebLink
The minimum lot width in the R-1 Rural Residential District is 200 feet. Lot width is defined as <br />the measurement of that portion of the lot that abuts the public road and if more than one road is <br />involved, policy is to take the measurement at the road the driveway will access. In this case, <br />Mr. Nordvik is proposing that both homes will use two existing accesses onto County Road 83. <br />The lots are at least 200 feet wide adjacent to County Road #83. <br /> <br />However, Code states that when there is a choice between a local street and a county or state <br />road, the driveway should access the local street. Eland Street stubs into the subject property <br />from the north and could serve Lot 2. Strict interpretation would require that the driveway for <br />Lot 2 access Eland Street. If that were the case, a variance to the lot width would be required in <br />order to build on Lot 2. By definition, Lot 2 would only be 66 feet wide where it abuts Eland <br />Street. Another option is require the extension, dedication and construction of Eland Street to <br />service Lot 2. <br /> <br />Staff would recommend that the two existing driveways onto County Road #83 be utilized as <br />temporary access. The minor subdivision development agreement should require that if and <br />when the property subdivides further, both driveways will be converted to a local street interior <br />to the plat. To facilitate this plan, staff is requesting that the corridors for the extension of Eland <br />Street from the north and 157~ Avenue from the east be preserved within the plat boundaries by <br />linear parks and drainage and utility easements. At the time the property is further subdivided, or <br />upon the City's request, these easements would be conveyed to the City for road right of way <br />purposes. The plat has been forwarded.to Anoka County Highway Department for review; no <br />comments have been received to date. <br /> <br />The developer is responsible for providing the City with a resubdivision plan to show an ultimate <br />plan for the property if and when it is served by City sewer and water. A plan has been provided <br />but should be modified to reflect the 37.5 foot wide park corridor along the south property <br />boundary. <br /> <br />The Park Commission reviewed the proposed subdivision on March 8, 2001. They have <br />recommended dedication of a trail extension along the south boundary of the plat. The <br />remainder of park dedication due would be satisfied with a cash payment. <br /> <br />Recommendation: <br /> <br />City Staff recommends approval of the minor subdivision. <br /> <br />Commission Action: <br /> <br />Motion to approve the sketch plan for Nordvik Addition and recommend that the applicant <br />proceed to the final plat stage contingent upon compliance with the City Staff Review Letter <br />dated March 27, 2001. <br /> <br />Review Checklist: <br />Principal Planner <br />City Engineer <br />Parks/Utilities Supervisor <br /> <br />PC: 4/3/01 <br /> <br /> <br />