My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Planning Commission - 02/06/2020
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Planning Commission
>
2020
>
Minutes - Planning Commission - 02/06/2020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 10:42:23 AM
Creation date
6/25/2020 10:21:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
02/06/2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ms. Carlson confirmed that they are very comparable and noted that they chose the Wisconsin <br /> builder because they have a relationship with that company. <br /> Noah Barka, 7520 149th Avenue NW, stated that he and his wife look forward to the <br /> development of this area. He stated that his primary concern is with the transition plan between <br /> the subject property and their property. He commented that even though there is a home <br /> business, that is not a traditional commercial use. He stated that a larger transition zone would <br /> ensure harmonious interaction between the properties. He stated that he also has concerns with <br /> how the transition will be defined as the area has sandy soils and would not support plantings <br /> without adjustments to the soil and irrigation. He asked how the buffer would be maintained <br /> after construction. He suggested hardscape such as a berm or fencing. He expressed concerns to <br /> the wetland and the impact this development may have on the wetland. He asked how the lights <br /> pollution would be mitigated. He did not believe it would be appropriate to approve the proposal <br /> tonight and asked that the additional elements be addressed prior to approval. <br /> Commissioner Anderson asked how the resident feels about the comments made by the <br /> developer about additional trees. <br /> Mr. Barka commented that currently there is a very minimal transition, noting that there would <br /> not be a barrier between the two properties. He stated that even if there are extensive <br /> landscaping plans condensed to the buffer, it would be difficult to ensure that the plantings and <br /> landscaping continues to be maintained. <br /> City Planner Anderson reviewed the basic landscaping requirements of the City including the <br /> requirement for topsoil. He stated that the Development Agreement would stipulate that the <br /> plantings are there permanently and therefore would need to be replaced when needed. He stated <br /> that while irrigation systems are no longer required, there were plans that included an irrigation <br /> system. He stated that the stormwater management plan was approved by engineering and the <br /> Lower Rum River Water Management Organization and described the treatment that would be <br /> provided. <br /> Commissioner VanScoy referenced the area designated as PUD, which the resident commented <br /> is generally used for residential. He stated that it appears the residential is far to the north with <br /> business activity to occur to the south and closer to this development parcel. <br /> Mr. Barka confirmed that the homes are located on the northern parcel of the property with the <br /> bottom third intended for commercial use. He stated that when there was commercial activity, <br /> there was a conflict between the two uses. He stated that even though the property is zoned in <br /> that method, the ultimate goal is to create an orderly and harmonious development and therefore <br /> the issue with the transition is the same. <br /> Senior Planner McGuire Brigl stated that the northern properties feel as common residential uses <br /> when you are onsite, even though commercial activity is allowed. <br /> Commissioner Gengler asked what the dotted line north of the development identifies. <br /> Planning Commission/February 6, 2020 <br /> Page 5 of 18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.