Laserfiche WebLink
ATTN: City Council Members, Planning Commission Members, City Staff <br />Greetings, <br />Please allow us to introduce ourselves. Our names are Jake and Jon Packer. We are the listing <br />brokers for the Trott Brook North development. We both have B.S. Degrees in Real Estate <br />Sales & Appraisal, we are both Commercial Real Estate Appraisers, Licensed Assessors, and <br />Realtors. We are also the great, great, grandsons of William Makowsky, who purchased the <br />Trott Brook North Development land back in 1914. We are reaching out to you so that you might <br /> <br />Addressing public feedback concerns: <br />The main concerns of residents seem to revolve around the overall change in this area from <br />rural to urban. Residents seem concerned about the impact this change will have on wildlife, <br />the natural attributes of the land, and city infrastructure. We feel residents need to understand <br />that the city has been planning for development in this area for over two decades. This land has <br />been slated for city utilities since before the year 2000 and has been zoned R-1 MUSA since <br />2012. The Comprehensive Plan already accounts for and addresses the needed infrastructure <br />and environmental changes associated with development of this area. <br />are still opposed to the development. Based upon public comment, especially on social media <br />platforms there is a concerted effort to push for maintaining the 80-foot lot requirement. It <br />appears this effort has little to do with lot sizes and more to do with reducing the economic <br />desirability of the land in the hopes that buyers will not find developing financially feasible; <br />ultimately keeping the land undeveloped. We understand that neighboring residents enjoy the <br />beauty of the open space and seeing the wildlife that comes with it. We cannot tell you how <br />happy it has made us to have been able to provide that for the last 106 years. However, at a <br />certain point keeping the land at its current use is no longer economically feasible. We believe it <br />is our right as landowners and your responsibility as a city to utilize the land to its highest and <br />best use. It is unreasonable for residents to try to prevent us from having a marketable and <br />maximally productive property. <br />well within the limits allowed in the R-1 Zoning District. Their goal is simply to reduce lot <br />frontage on a portion of the development, which will provide buyers with lower lot prices and a <br />more desirable development layout (every 1 foot of street frontage increases hard costs $600, <br />not including builder mark-ups). Essentially, lot sizes will remain relatively unchanged, but will <br />have smaller side yards and larger backyards giving buyers more variety in their lot. This lot <br />layout has proven time and again to be preferable in the current marketplace and is more <br />aesthetically pleasing and cost effective to the end lot buyer. <br />Why the city council should support lots sized smaller than 80 feet: <br />We understand that as elected officials you must weigh resident concerns, landowner rights, <br />and what is best for the city. However, many of these neighboring residents are uneducated in <br />real estate economics and may not understand what is best for the city as a whole. The city <br />council is entrusted to make difficult decisions based on the information at hand. Information <br />and resources from industry experts can provide useful guidance and support for creating a <br />cohesive and marketable development within the city of Ramsey. Below are some resources <br />and supporting points that stress the importance of allowing a mixture of lot frontages. <br /> <br />