Laserfiche WebLink
Case #7: <br /> <br />Request for Site Plan Review; Case of Sunfish Commons; Convenience <br />Store <br /> <br />Principal Planner Trudgeon stated that Sunfish Properties, L.L.C is proposing to redevelop the <br />property located at the northwest comer of the intersection of State Highway #10 and CSAH #57 <br />(Sunfish Lake Boulevard). McKay Auto Sales currently operates from the site. Sunfish <br />Properties is not ready to bring forward the site plan at this time. Staff has sent the applicant a <br />waiver form from the 60-day role. They have agreed to sign it. Staff recommended that the site <br />plan for Lot 2, Block 1, Sunfish Commons be tabled until such a time the applicant brings <br />forward the site plan for approval. <br /> <br />Motion by Chairperson Nixt, seconded by Commissioner Kociscak, to table the site plan for Lot <br />2, Block 1, Sunfish Commons until such time the applicant brings forward the site plan for <br />approval provided that the 60-day role waiver is received by staff, otherwise the item should be <br />placed on the June Planning Commission meeting agenda.. <br /> <br />Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Nixt, Commissioners Kociscak, Sweet, Watson, and <br />Wivoda. Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioners Johnson and Reeve. <br /> <br />Case #8: Ramsey Comprehensive Plan Public Hearing Dates <br /> <br />Principal Planner Tmdgeon stated that at April 24, 2001 City Council meeting, the Council <br />referred the March 2001 draft of the Comprehensive Plan to the Planning Commission to <br />schedule public hearings. The Metropolitan Council approved the March 2001 draft at their <br />meeting on March 28, 2001. Staff proposes that at least one of the public hearing be an <br />"informal" public hearing, where staff and Commissioners will be at stations to discuss the <br />details of the Comprehensive Plan one-on-one with residents. The second public hearing could <br />take the more traditional route of a public hearing where people would come in front of the <br />Planning Commission to testify in support or opposition to the Comprehensive Plan. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt stated that he liked the suggestion of the informal forum with the Planning <br />Commission and felt that it would be appropriate for the C!ty Council to hold one public hearing <br />since there are different view points regarding the Comprehensive Plan amongst the Council that <br />the Commission would not be able to answer. <br /> <br />Commissioner Wivoda stated that he was part of the first informal comprehensive plan public <br />hearing that was held and he felt that it was a very good forum. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt stated that he would like an understanding of what the Commission's <br />objectives are to be prior to the public hearing being held. <br /> <br />Commissioner Watson suggested that the Council be present at the informal meeting. <br /> <br />Planning Commission/May 1, 2001 <br /> Page 12 of 14 <br /> <br /> <br />