Laserfiche WebLink
CC Regular Session 5. 16. <br />Meeting Date: 06/23/2020 <br />By: Chloe McGuire Brigl, Community <br />Development <br />Information <br />Title <br />Adopt Resolution #20-137 Approving an Easement Encroachment Agreement with Armstrong West Retail Mall, <br />LLC for Installation and Maintenance of a Sign in a Drainage and Utility Easement at 8019 146th Ave NW <br />(Project No. 19-111); Case of PSD, LLC dba Armstrong West Retail Mall, LLC <br />Purpose/Background: <br />The purpose of this case is to review a request from PSD, LLC doing business as Armstrong West Retail Mall, <br />LLC (the "Applicant") for Installation and Maintenance of a Sign in a Drainage and Utility Easement at 8019 <br />146th Ave NW (the "Subject Property"). <br />Notification: <br />Notification is not required. <br />Observations/Alternatives: <br />The Applicant received a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for an oversized monument sign on the Subject Property, <br />and is working with DeMars Signs for the monument sign. DeMars signs applied for and received a permit for a <br />permanent sign on the Subject Property. The base of the sign was placed in a drainage and utility easement onsite. <br />An easement encroachment agreement is required to keep the sign where it was placed and had been previously <br />contemplated. Upon completion of the footing, it was discovered that the footing was closer to a sanitary sewer line <br />than originally anticipated. What had been anticipated as a housekeeping item at a later date given that the sign was <br />included in site plan approval now needs more immediate action. Staff reiterates that the Applicant took all the <br />necessary steps and secured the proper permit from the City prior to construction. There is no damage nor <br />immediate concern of damage to the sanitary sewer line. Staff simply wants to have the encroachment agreement in <br />place before the sign is completed. This is a fairly standard process. <br />This 75 foot tall sign with a readerboard on the top. The sign is a significant cost to the landowner, and moving the <br />sign would also require significant cost. Staff is recommending an easement encroachment agreement to allow the <br />sign to stay where it was originally placed, which required boring into the ground to ensure the sign remains stable <br />and safe onsite. Staff does believe the sign is safe where it is placed, and the Engineering Department is working <br />with the Applicant and their sign contractor to inspect under the sign to get a clear understanding of what is <br />underground in the easements onsite. <br />Staff recommends approval of the easement encroachment agreement to allow the sign to be built where the base <br />was placed. <br />Funding Source: <br />Staff is handling this process as part of normal duties. <br />Recommendation: <br />Staff recommends adoption of Resolution #20-137 approving an easement encroachment agreement for the sign to <br />remain on an easement in the Subject Property. <br />Action: <br />