My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council - 06/23/2020
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council
>
2020
>
Minutes - Council - 06/23/2020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2025 11:21:44 AM
Creation date
7/21/2020 3:03:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
06/23/2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmember Kuzma stated that he would support the tiered lot sizes as discussed. He stated <br /> that he also agrees with the issue of safety and would support a full connection that could support <br /> a fire truck. He stated that he would also be open to exploring preservation of additional wooded <br /> acres as that is a great asset to the community. <br /> Mayor LeTourneau stated that the residents of Bowers Drive accept that a second access will most <br /> likely be required and are now focusing on how that could be designed to not infringe upon the <br /> existing neighborhood but still provide access to fire trucks and emergency vehicles. <br /> Councilmember Musgrove asked if any changes are being made to the land use. <br /> Deputy City Administrator Gladhill explained that this framework would guide those <br /> conversations, noting that at some point a rezoning would be necessary. He stated that this is a <br /> nonbinding document that provided policy direction that would be implemented in future steps. <br /> Councilmember Musgrove stated that she would like to see what could be done to preserve the <br /> tree canopy area but also understands that this is private land and has the ability to develop. She <br /> stated that she also likes option two. <br /> Steve Bona, Capstone, stated that the Pearsons own the trees on the property. He stated that <br /> Capstone has had success in Ramsey and appreciates working with City staff. He stated that the <br /> Riverdale connection to Highway 10 needs to be more known so that they can design their concept <br /> with the knowledge of how it connects to Highway 10. He stated that they would propose full <br /> park fees and dedication of two acres of trees to be preserved through the park and buffer. He <br /> stated that there have been a lot of comments related to tree preservation. He noted that another <br /> option would be heavy on park dedication land and lighter on the park fees. He stated that there <br /> are 79 acres and they could dedicate eight acres of park that could be all-natural trees. He stated <br /> that Capstone also suggested a bonus for the smaller lots which could equate to another two acres, <br /> which would be a total of ten acres of park land. He noted that option would not involve park fees <br /> but would provide the opportunity to preserve those trees. He stated that if they preserve that ten <br /> acres, they lose development area which loses economy of scale to make the development work. <br /> He noted that the total tree canopy area is 23 acres. He stated that if they go beyond that ten acres, <br /> they cannot make the development work financially because they could not pay for Riverdale <br /> Drive and could not pay for landscaping and common areas. He asked for feedback on that tonight <br /> so that they could work that into the concept plan and continue to move forward. He stated that <br /> they provided the first alignment for Riverdale with access to the west of the buildings. <br /> John Dobbs stated that he has helped the Pearsons for some time and was the developer of Pearson <br /> Place. He stated that when Pearson Place was developed there was a joint effort between the <br /> neighborhood, planning staff, property owner and developer to finish off Bowers Drive. He <br /> explained that the 50-foot buffer was provided as a buffer and acknowledgement that there would <br /> be density on the other side of the trees compared to the unique Bowers Drive neighborhood. He <br /> stated that he understands the desire to save trees but noted that this is not a new dialogue. He <br /> stated that this is about the Pearsons property and their tenure in the City. He stated that the <br /> Pearsons are fond of the existing residents and have provided that buffer. He stated that when he <br /> City Council/June 23,2020 <br /> Page 18 of 21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.