My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council - 04/28/2020
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council
>
2020
>
Minutes - Council - 04/28/2020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2025 11:20:00 AM
Creation date
7/22/2020 1:31:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
04/28/2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Councilmember Heinrich asked if there is a possibility to reduce the project scope and feasibility <br />in a manner which would still support the needs of staff and the community now and in the <br />future years. She stated that public is not in the public works facility very often and asked for <br />more input on how often public space would be used. <br /> <br />Public Works Superintendent Riemer replied that the proposed design is efficient and would like <br />to stay at that level. He stated that if a reduction was done, the first place would be the <br />workshops, which would push that activity into the parking spaces which is not efficient. He <br />stated that the public space has been designed in the event a public meeting room is needed or <br />polling place is needed. He explained that it is becoming difficult to use churches and schools <br />for voting and this would be another option. He noted that this would also be another option for <br />public meeting space without interfering with the public works operations. <br /> <br />Mayor LeTourneau commented that it would invite the public to interact with the building and <br />having a dual purpose is another element of efficiency. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kuzma stated that on the site tours, Elk River had that option and he found it to <br />be a good use. He stated that he would be interested in option three. He stated that if the City <br />could make this work now with the low interest rates, it could be in the best interest of the City <br />to complete the total project now rather than completing the addition in the future. <br /> <br />Councilmember Menth asked for clarification on the comment that was made that this design <br />would support the current number of vehicles for the City, but that public works will most likely <br />add vehicles in the near future. <br /> <br />Public Works Superintendent Riemer confirmed that in an attempt to lower the cost, this was <br />designed to support 12 vehicles and public works already has 11. He confirmed that additional <br />plow trucks will most likely be added in the near future in order to maintain the eight-hour <br />plowing threshold, depending on development. <br /> <br />Councilmember Menth stated that as much as the City would like to save money and scale down <br />the project, the building should be built to support the needs of the community for at least the <br />next five years. <br /> <br />Councilmember Musgrove stated that she was surprised at the size of the area proposed for <br />public use. She stated that this area should instead be focused on use by public works. She <br />asked the original budget. <br /> <br />Public Works Superintendent Riemer replied that the original BKV estimate was $15,000,000. <br /> <br />Councilmember Musgrove asked the number of vehicles that would be stored in the older <br />buildings. <br /> <br />Public Works Superintendent Riemer replied that the vehicles would not be parked in that space, <br />noting that the cold storage would be used for storage of other equipment. He recognized that <br />City Council / April 28, 2020 <br />Page 9 of 12 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.