Minutes - Council - 05/26/2020 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Councilmember Musgrove asked how the developer would feel about having more options for 80 foot lots versus including a park on the site. She stated that when reviewing Brookfield there are playgrounds within the yards of the homes and noted that the neighborhood also has connections to other neighborhood parks. Deputy City Administrator Gladhill stated that the Park and Recreation Commission does recommend a park in this general area. He provided details on the intent to provide City parks within walking distance to homes. Mr. Schmidt stated that they proposed a park based on what they saw on the City maps planning for future parks. He stated that based on their survey of the area it makes sense to have a park in this area. He stated that economically more homes rather than a park would be more profitable. Senior Planner McGuire Brigl stated that a portion of the proposed park is located under the power lines, which would be the highest and best use, as homes cannot be constructed in that area. Acting Mayor Riley stated that the City creates a Comprehensive Plan every 10 years, so that residents know what the expect as the City moves forward. He did not see a reason that should be changed, as the draft Comprehensive Plan has not even been fully executed. Deputy City Administrator Gladhill stated that this land was previously identified as preserve in the 2020 plan, whereas the 2030 plan identified the property to be developed with urban services, as does the draft 2040 plan. He stated that while there is a plan, the City can consider variations if it feels that the proposed plan would be a better fit. He explained that staff is looking for guidance from the Council on whether the strict guiding should be followed, or whether there is flexibility. Acting Mayor Riley acknowledged the reoccurring theme of balancing urban and rural characters. He stated that perhaps 55 foot lots have a spot along Highway 10 and within The COR, but he does not believe that 55 foot lots belong on the northern edge of Ramsey. Councilmember Specht stated that he continues to hear that people like the rural character with more development in The COR. He believed that the rural areas of Ramsey need to remain rural and therefore would not be supportive of reducing lot sizes. Councilmember Heinrich stated that she also believes that this would drastically change the rural characteristic of the northern border of Ramsey, which is what attracted those residents to their homes. She stated that this plan does not fit with the northern border of Ramsey and the rural character and therefore would not support the project as is. Councilmember Kuzma stated that the property is guided for R-1, which allows 80-foot lots. He stated that a number of residents were comfortable with 80-foot lots, and therefore does not see a conflict. Deputy City Administrator Gladhill stated that staff has the obligation to walk these requests through, noting that the developer is requesting feedback and review of a project including 75, 65, City Council / May 26, 2020 Page 12 of 16