Laserfiche WebLink
having the dock in this area because it is a narrow lot and it would not fit into the neighborhood. <br />He stated that he would not want to block the creek at all. <br />City Planner Anderson commented that it was just brought to his attention that the neighboring <br />property does have a dock. He stated that there is a public boat launch at the County Regional <br />Park. He noted that there is a similar setup further up the river, where a homeowners association <br />has a dock that serves multiple properties but noted that HOA has much more shoreline and is <br />not near an oxbow. <br />Commissioner Peters asked the type of dock. He stated that if the dock is removable, he would <br />question where it would be stored and if it is permanent it would cause a problem with debris. <br />City Planner Anderson stated that staff has limited information at this time and therefore is <br />unsure of the type of dock that would be used. He stated that typically river docks are temporary <br />and pulled out at the end of the boating season to avoid damage from ice. He stated that the <br />potential applicant stated that they would extend a pedestrian trail to access the dock, which <br />could have an impact to the shoreline and trees noting that staff worked hard with the developer <br />to protect the shoreline and trees. <br />Commissioner VanScoy stated that he would interpret a marina to be multiple slips, where a <br />dock is smaller and intended for a few people to use. He asked the difference between a marina <br />and a dock and when the DNR would need to be brought in. <br />City Planner Anderson replied that a marina would be a commercial enterprise. He stated that <br />this would be a multiple slip dock that serves more than one user, although within the private <br />neighborhood. He stated that the DNR noted that until they had more information on how the <br />slips would be awarded, they could not make the determination on whether a DNR permit would <br />be necessary. He stated that if this were to come forward for formal consideration, staff would <br />continue to work with the DNR. <br />Commissioner VanScoy stated that his interpretation would be that a reasonable sized dock <br />would be acceptable but a mega dock with multiple slips seems to be too much. He stated that <br />there are only seven homes and questioned how many boats would be in the water at one time. <br />City Planner Anderson stated that the original communication from the applicant attempted to <br />accommodate each lot of the development, but the applicant acknowledged that would not be <br />feasible and instead attempted to accommodate the seven lots. He stated that even with the new <br />information received today, the consultant acknowledged that it would even be difficult to <br />accommodate seven slips because of the narrow lot and position on the river. <br />Commissioner Anderson stated that the neighborhood was not pleased with the development and <br />therefore if this moves forward, he would like to see it done as a public hearing to allow the <br />residents to provide input. He stated that this does not appeal to him in the form presented. He <br />believed that additional information would be needed before the developer could be provided <br />with the desired feedback. <br />Planning Commission/ June 4, 2020 <br />Page 11 of 18 <br />