Laserfiche WebLink
building setbacks, a narrower private street, and a public street that exceeds 600 feet <br /> <br />9. That the preliminary plat is proposing 50.2% private open space as part of the development,~-i <br /> which meets the 50% requirement for private open space required under City OrdinanCes. <br /> <br /> 10. That the proposed development will exercise substantial detrimental <br /> market value of surrounding properties, .. ~:{¢;~ :?-"'-ii} <br /> <br />11 That the proposed development will show a favorable economic.impact on!he community <br /> <br /> 12. That the proposed development will adversely impact natural:,_f~amreS'-such as wetlands, <br /> water features, woodlands, and steep slopes. ¥?~,~ <br /> <br />13. That the proposed development will noi protect and preserge~ sceni~'~ualities to the greatest <br /> <br />14. That the proposed development will impose undue~burden on public services and facilities, <br /> including fire and police protection, schools, streets; .water systems, sanitary sewer systems <br /> and storm sewer systems. ,-'J?¥,~ <br /> <br />15. That the proposed development isnot designed in .such a way as to form a desirable and <br /> unified environment within its oTM boundarie§} ahd also will be detrimental to future land <br /> uses in the surrounding areas. <br /> <br />NOWTHEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL FINDS THE <br />FOLLOWING DEVIATIONS FROM CITY CODE UNACCEPTABLE: <br /> <br />I. That the following deviatior~ .from City Ordinances are found acceptable as part of this PUD; <br /> smaller lot sizes, narrower 10t-_widths for the detached townhouses, reduced building <br /> setbacks, the combination 0f sin. gle.. family and detached townhouse units, a narrower private <br /> street, and a public streetthat is 640 feet in length. <br /> <br />The motion for the'adopti0n of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember , and upon-vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof.' <br /> <br />and the following voted against the same: <br /> <br />and the folloWing abstained: <br /> <br />and the following were absent: <br /> <br />-250- <br /> <br />RESOLUTION #05-xx-xxx <br /> Page 2 of 3 <br /> <br /> <br />