Laserfiche WebLink
Chairperson Nixt asked if the cul-de-sac length would require a variance. <br />Associ ate Planner Wald stated they could deal with the deviation as part <br /> <br />Commissioner Brauer noted that what the residents need to understand is if a developer comes in <br />and says this is how I want it, Staff cannot change that unless it breaks the law, which this does <br /> <br />Chaixperson Nixt indicated when they have granted variances on length <br />does not think there was so much density. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Wald noted that Alpine Meadows has a <br />higher density. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt stated he sees the cul-de-sac ' <br />is not subject to transitioning requirements, they <br />is surrounding this is one house on ten-acre lots. <br />will be developed. <br /> <br />He <br /> <br />this length and <br /> <br />he <br /> <br /> indicated while this <br /> of a PUD, and what <br />assUme those other lots <br /> <br />Mot/on carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Nixt, <br />Shepherd, and W. atson. Voting No: None. Absent: <br /> <br />Commissioner Van Scoy stated he does:not:see a reason for a PUD. if there is a reason <br />besides density. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt indicated he ~ees th:~ ~se of a g~: agi~a, di~hsity increase or a means of <br />developing a challengdng site. He stated ~at is wh~}~ said ~'iast meeting ~at he wanted to <br />see this as an R-1 development, and then'~e w0ul'~ be wi~i~:'to look at a PUD because it is a <br />somewhat challenging kite. ...... He added that ~'¢~0uld only consider a PUD at an R-1 density. He <br />stated the site is challenging b~cause of its t~b~aphy, but developing it as R-1 would alleviate <br />the trafYm conce~s, and sho~'the cul-de-sad~:" ?~ <br /> <br />Motion by Chai~erson Nixk %~pnded by ~¢missioner Van ScoY, to deny the prelimina~ plat <br />and the site plan for ~e <br /> l. The cul-de-sac'l~n~h is too long. <br /> 2. T3affic concerns(' :~; <br /> 3. There is unce~ain* :[e~rding Potassium Street, and resolution could impact the <br /> eve . <br /> 4. There are'density tr~Sitioning concerns. <br /> 5. And, outstanding issues raised in the CiW Staff Review Le~er. <br /> <br /> Commissioners Van Scoy, Brauer, LeVine, <br /> Co~issiOner Jonson. <br /> <br />Public Hearing Request to Rezone Property from R-1 Single Family <br />Residential to Planned Unit Development; Case of National Growth, LLC <br /> <br />Case #6 ' <br /> <br />Public Hearing <br /> <br />Planning Commission/April 7, 2005 <br /> Page 15 of 23 <br /> <br />-289- <br /> <br /> <br />