Laserfiche WebLink
9. That the preliminary plat is proposing 59% private open space as part of the development,.:.i <br /> which exceeds.the 50% private open space area requirement established in City Code. <br /> <br /> 10. That the proposed development will exercise substantial detrimental influence on the <br /> market value of surrounding properties, :;:".i:: -_ i'( <br /> I1. That the proposed development will not show a favorable economic impact. 0h,~;the <br /> community at large. '}. <br /> <br /> 12. That the proposed development will ·adversely impact.natural feature~' such:as wetlands, <br /> water features, woodlands, and steep slopes. "~' '-('iLiT!,:.,~ ¢25?/ <br /> 13. That the proposed development will not protect and preserve sCe~k quaikies to the greatest <br /> <br /> 14. That the proposed development will impose undue burd~en:0n pubtid:'services and facilities, <br /> including fire and police protection, schools, streets, wat~t':sySfems, sanitary sewer systems <br /> and storm sewer systems. -..~:~- '~' ..... <br /> <br /> 15. That the proposed development is not designed in such "a;'kay as to form a desirable and <br /> unified environment within its own bounda~es~: and also will be detrimental to future land <br /> uses in the surrounding areas. <br /> <br /> NOWTHEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT· TI:I-E CITY COUNCIL DOES NOT FIND <br /> THE FOLLOWING DEVIATIONS FROM CITy CODE ACCEPTABLE: <br /> <br /> 1. That the following deviations from City Ordinances are found acceptable as part of this PUD; <br /> smaller lot sizes, narrower 10t: Widths, reduced building setbacks, and a public street that <br /> exceeds 600 feet in length. --~,_ 7?'Y- <br /> <br /> The motion for'the adoption oft. he foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember , and upon-vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: <br /> <br /> · ' ' '2'" ~'7 <br /> and the following Voted against.the same: <br /> <br /> and the following abstained: <br /> <br /> and the following were absent: <br /> <br />-whereuPon said resolution was declared duly .passed and adopted by the Ramsey City Council <br /> this the day of 1May 2005. <br /> <br />-292- <br /> <br />RESOLUTION #05-xx-xxx <br /> Page 2 of 3 <br /> <br /> <br />