Laserfiche WebLink
City Planner Anderson replied that he assumes that the plan was developed based on comments <br /> from the previous iteration. He stated that if this has morphed into small lot single family, or <br /> something similar to COR 3, planting requirements would be based on street frontage. He stated <br /> that the landscaping plan could then be modified and some of this confusion might be eliminated. <br /> He agreed that it does not appear density transitioning would be required as part of this initial <br /> phase. <br /> Mr. Lazan stated that he would be more than happy to work with staff to better reflect the <br /> requirements of small lot single family. He noted that they would also be willing to work to <br /> allow more diversity in building materials as well. He agreed that perhaps the staff comments <br /> from the previous concept were carried through in the development of this plat. <br /> 6.02: Approve Planning Framework for Highway 10 South Planning Area — Riverstone <br /> South <br /> Presentation <br /> Deputy City Administrator Gladhill presented the Staff Report stating that staff would like clear <br /> policy direction on the points raised in the staff report. <br /> Commission Business <br /> Commissioner Gengler asked to see the alternative road layouts and which is being proposed. <br /> Deputy City Administrator Gladhill stated that this was developed later in the process because of <br /> input from residents on Bowers Drive. He provided additional details on the road alignment and <br /> connection to Bowers Drive. He noted that the connection to Bowers would be a public road but <br /> would not be Riverdale Drive. <br /> Commissioner VanScoy referenced the public safety connection to Bowers Drive and noted that <br /> under any other circumstance he would not understand why a minimum access for safety is being <br /> considered as it seems inadequate. He stated that there are a lot of residents on Bowers Drive <br /> and asked why a connection to the new development is not proposed. <br /> Deputy City Administrator Gladhill noted that has been discussed at length. He stated that there <br /> has been opposition from those on Bowers Drive. He noted that the existing situation was not <br /> created by the developer. He stated that City can choose to make the road a full road, but the <br /> residents on Bowers Drive do not want that. He stated that public safety feels that it would be <br /> adequate as proposed. He stated that the two neighbors in Pearson Place seemed unaware that <br /> the plan would be to connect the area, even though the 60-foot corridor was collected. He stated <br /> that the Commission could make the recommendation for a full road, but this seemed to be an <br /> adequate compromise. <br /> Planning Commission/June 4,2020 <br /> Page 14 of 18 <br />