My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Charter Commission - 08/27/2020
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Charter Commission
>
2020
>
Agenda - Charter Commission - 08/27/2020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/28/2025 1:13:50 PM
Creation date
8/25/2020 10:21:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Charter Commission
Document Date
08/27/2020
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
221
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Attorney Langel replied that Option 2 is the shortest period of time an appointee can remain <br />in office, however, would come with higher staff time and costs as it forces Council to hold a <br />Special Election. He stated Option 4 is the best option if the Commission would like to limit the <br />time of an appointee, staff time, and costs. He stated the longest an appointee will be in office <br />without an election is approximately 15 months. <br />Commissioner Bendtsen stated he would like to eliminate as much ability to manipulate the <br />process as possible. <br />Commissioner Sivertson stated that no matter what, there will be an appointee by the Council. <br />Commissioner Fuhreck concurred with Commissioner Bendtsen stating that he was concerned <br />about appointees serving long periods of time without being elected and supports minimizing <br />costs. <br />Commissioner Leistico asked what the maximum f an appointee would serve. <br />City Attorney Langel stated Option 4 would permit the appointee to serve aroximately 15 <br />months. <br />The general consensus of the Commission was to go with Option 4. <br />City Attorney Langel explained the changes to Section 4.56, stating the edits cleared up the <br />vagueness and illegality of the original language, primarily eliminating the ability of the Council <br />to appoint an individual to office if they believed there weren't a sufficient number of candidates <br />in the election. <br />Having completed the discussion, Chairperson `.;' d asked for motions on each section of <br />Chapter 4. <br />Motion Commissioner Deemer, seconded by Commissioner Leistico, to approve Chapter 4, <br />Secti=vi , Option 1 as modified by the City Attorney's office. <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Commissioners Deemer, Leistico, Bendtsen, Fuhreck, and <br />Sivertson. Voting No: Chairperson Field and Commissioner Anderson. Absent: Commissioner <br />Niederhaus. <br />Motion by Commissioner Bendtsen, seconded by Commissioner Sivertson, to approve Chapter 4, <br />Section 4.2, Option 1 as modified by the City Attorney's office. <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Commissioners Bendtsen, Sivertson, Deemer, Fuhreck, and <br />Leistico. Voting No: Chairperson Field and Commissioner Anderson. Absent: Commissioner <br />Niederhaus. <br />Motion by Commissioner Fuhreck, seconded by Commissioner Bendtsen, to approve Chapter 4, <br />Section 4.3 as modified by the City Attorney's office. <br />Charter Commission/ October 17, 2019 <br />Page 8 of 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.