Laserfiche WebLink
documents also gave us important data to consider each cities' local road expenditures. While the <br />documents gave us some road funding information, the interviews filled in the gaps for funding <br />sources not included in documents and provided additional insight for why certain funding <br />mechanisms were employed in each city. <br />Procedure for Constructing the Sample of Cities <br />A purposeful sampling procedure was used to select the comparable cities for the interviews with <br />City Administrators or Managers. Comparable cities were identified using a set of inclusion and <br />exclusion criteria that were developed, in part, with the input of the City of Ramsey. These criteria <br />include population size between 15,000 and 100,000, location in the seven -county metro region, <br />and per capita spending on roads between $50-$150. Each of the criteria used to bound the sample <br />in this study were purposefully chosen. The study used population size because a similar amount <br />of traffic will produce a similar amount of wear and tear on the roads. The study limited the sample <br />to cities within the seven -county metro region because cities within this region will have <br />comparable weather patterns and traffic conditions, both of which also impact the rate at which <br />roads sustain wear and tear. Finally, the study used per capita spending on roads to restrict the <br />sample to cities that closely resemble the City of Ramsey's current road funding levels, controlling <br />for population. <br />The sample for our first wave of recruitment consisted of two cities from each of the seven counties <br />in the metro region with the exception of Carver.5 The study initially used the criteria of two cities <br />per county because the research aims to provide a balanced look at cities across the metro, and to <br />control for any differences in road fiscal policy between counties. Due to the low response rate in <br />our first wave, brought on by the COVID-19 pandemic, we broadened our sample to a second <br />wave of cities, dispersed throughout each of the counties with comparable cities. The cities were <br />identified using State Auditor data from 2017 (the latest year available) to confirm population size, <br />location in the seven -county metro region, and road spending per capita.6 <br />Research Design <br />The study design included literature review, preliminary interviews, recruitment, interviews, and <br />analysis phases and took place over the course of roughly three months from February through <br />April 2020 (Table 1). We began by conducting a background research and a literature review at <br />the Humphrey School of Public Affairs. The research team next conducted an informal background <br />interview with our client, the City Administrator of the City of Ramsey, to better understand the <br />unique social, economic, and political context in Ramsey. We then arranged an informational <br />interview with a local transportation expert to gain a better background and understanding of the <br />different road funding techniques and options available to local governments in Minnesota. From <br />these interviews and conversations, we developed the sample's inclusion and exclusion criteria, <br />the interview protocol seen in Appendix C, and the potential criteria cities use to assess different <br />local road funding techniques (equity, efficiency, adequacy, and feasibility). An illustrative <br />conceptual framework of the research design can be found in Appendix D. <br />5 Only one city from Carver County fit within the bounds of our other inclusion and exclusion criteria so only one <br />city was included. <br />6 Minnesota Office of the State Auditor's comparison tool <br />https: //www. auditor. state.mn.us/default. aspx?page=ComparisonTools <br />4 <br />