Laserfiche WebLink
Phone Number <br />TFor purposes of Public Safety Response, do you support a second access to Bowers Drive?* <br />Yes, I support a full public road connection <br />Yes, but only if it is used by Public Safety (and Public Works Maintenance) <br />No, I do not support a second connection to Bowers Drive <br />Other (please describe below) <br />Disclaimer <br />For purposes of this suney, a non -response will be considered as a non -objection to the connection. <br />Please comment and explain your response above. <br />I feel there is no real need, as in the past 80+ years no issues have happened that has allowed for no access the additional <br />road does not improve the issues beyond the connection so does not offer the correct solution if we are looking to improve <br />safety, I am concerned with increased foot pedestrian traffic on bowers drive as there is no side walk and no lighting down the <br />road as is already popular with residents. reduced security is also a concern as additional exits will exist for criminal a number <br />of independent studies have proven this in Minnesota. i am also concerned that the city and developer have not been <br />transparent of what the use of the out lot has been for, in the initial planning phase (12 new homes) or when i purchased my <br />house. <br />