My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 09/08/2020
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2020
>
Agenda - Council - 09/08/2020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 2:04:57 PM
Creation date
9/9/2020 12:32:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
09/08/2020
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
251
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Phone Number <br />TFor purposes of Public Safety Response, do you support a second access to Bowers Drive?* <br />Yes, I support a full public road connection <br />Yes, but only if it is used by Public Safety (and Public Works Maintenance) <br />No, I do not support a second connection to Bowers Drive <br />Other (please describe below) <br />Disclaimer <br />For purposes of this survey, a non -response will be considered as a non -objection to the connection. <br />Please comment and explain your response above. <br />We have lived on Bowers Drive for 30 years and have been perfectly happy with the level of "Safety" that we've had. We are <br />strongly opposed to the proposal to have a second access to Bowers Drive from Riverstone South. In the 30 years that we've <br />lived here, the road has been perfectly adequate from a safety perspective. The very last thing that we want is any additional <br />access to this road. We actually believe that our road is safer from crime in that it is a "dead end" and there is no other way in <br />or out. Why should residents of 242 homes have access to Bowers Drive??? WE DON'T WANT IT !!! <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.