Laserfiche WebLink
COMMITTEE BUSINESS <br /> <br />Case #1: Waco Street Traffic Concerns <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski stated that at the November 2000 Public Works Committee meeting, a <br />number of residents of Waco Street were present to discuss improving traffic safety on Waco <br />Street, specifically between 149"~ Avenue (Sunwood Drive) and 150th Avenue. The concerns of <br />the citizens expressed at the meeting were: <br /> Traffic is moving too fast along Waco Street <br />· There is limited sight distance of the trail to the east <br />· Traffic uses Waco Street to avoid T.H.//47 <br /> <br />The citizen requests included the following considerations: <br />· Place stop signs at 150"' Avenue and/or 149~h Avenue <br />· Paint a crosswalk at the trail crossing on Waco Street <br /> <br />At the time, it was suggested that a soon-to-be acquired speed trailer be employed to warn <br />drivers of the neighborhood speed concern and to collect speed data. In May, the results of the <br />speed survey were shared with the public and the Committee. Earlier, in January, an analysis of <br />cut-through traffic was prepared and distributed. The speed trailer data has been questioned by <br />residents. Do vehicles slow down when they see the speed display trailer? Certainly that's what <br />the desired action is if they are exceeding the posted limit. Additionally, it may be difficult to <br />arrive at a consensus of what constitutes the "problem speeding" definition. Engineering <br />standards suggest that 15 percent of drivers can be expected to drive faster than the upper limit of <br />what is considered a prudent speed. This.may be an engineering standard, but is it acceptable to <br />any particular neighborhood? The issue of Whether stop signs should be placed in this instance <br />will not be resolved by the collection of more data, unless they were to develop a policy with <br />some quantifiable standards. In addition, such standards would be admittedly arbitrary. The <br />neighborhood would like closure to this issue and staff agrees. The City has done or will do the <br />following within the next month: <br />· Add a painted and signed crosswalk at the trail crossing <br />· Re-stripe the centerline and white fog lines <br />· Paint "Stop" on the trail as it approaches waCo Street from both directions <br /> <br />The placement of stop signs along Waco Street remains the final issue. Certainly, "close calls" <br />and the daily experience of living on the street generate understandable causes for concern. <br />However, City policy makers must also be aware that the "may not help, but couldn't hurt" <br />attitude toward the placement of stop signs is simply not the case. As staff, they have an <br />obligation to use professional standards in arriving at conclusions and recommendations. The <br />professional guidelines for traffic issues which is incorporated by reference into City ordinances, <br />the Manual of Uniform Traffic ContrOl De;cices specifically states that stop signs are not to be <br />used for speed control. Furthermore, it is the engineering judgement of staff that conditions do <br /> <br />Public Works Committee/June 18, 2001 <br /> Page 2 of 13 <br /> <br /> <br />